[#7271] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7272] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — noreply@...
Bugs item #3399, was opened at 2006-01-31 22:25
[#7274] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7277] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7280] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7286] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@...
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Minero Aoki wrote:
mathew wrote:
mathew wrote:
I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
On 2006.02.07 10:03, Evan Webb wrote:
Umm, on what version are you seeing a warning there? I don't and never
On 2006.02.07 14:47, Evan Webb wrote:
I'd by far prefer it never emit a warning. The warning is assumes you
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7305] Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:45:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
In article <20060226171117.GB29508@tux-chan>,
In article <1140968746.321377.18843.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
Hi,
In article <m1FDshr-0006MNC@Knoppix>,
In article <87irr047sx.fsf@m17n.org>,
In article <87vev0hxu5.fsf@m17n.org>,
Just my quick 2 cents...
In article <92f5f81d0602281855g27e78f4eua8bf20e0b8e47b68@mail.gmail.com>,
Hi,
In article <m1FESAD-0001blC@Knoppix>,
Hi,
[#7331] Set containing duplicates — noreply@...
Bugs item #3506, was opened at 2006-02-08 22:52
[#7337] Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7344] Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...>
Hi, all. This is my first time posting to this mailing list.
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7347] Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>
It seems that the latest change to eval.c (1.616.2.154) has broken irb.
Hi,
Thanks, Matz.
[#7364] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — noreply@...
Bugs item #3565, was opened at 2006-02-15 02:32
Hi,
Hi,
On Pr 2006-02-16 at 03:18 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7376] Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
[#7396] IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#7403] Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>
Hi List,
Emiel van de Laar <emiel@rednode.nl> writes:
Hi --
[#7439] FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — mathew <meta@...>
dnsbl/bl.spamcop.net returned deny: for
[#7442] GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...>
I have been posting to the ruby-talk mailing list about ruby memory and GC, and I think it's ready
Hello.
Hello.
[ ruby-Patches-3503 ] Correction to string-to-float conversion of string with trailing 'e'
Patches item #3503, was opened at 2006-02-08 12:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=3503&group_id=426
Category: Ruby1.9
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Hartl (mhartl)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Correction to string-to-float conversion of string with trailing 'e'
Initial Comment:
The documentation for ruby_strtod in util.c says that in the string "-I.FE-X", either 'E' or the exponent 'X' can be omitted, but not both. The most recent version of Ruby in the CVS repository (1.9.0) does not exhibit this behavior, but rather silently ignores a trailing 'E':
irb> Float('5.0E')
=> 5.0
The following patch to ruby_strtod in util.c checks to make sure that 'e' or 'E' is not the last character in the string (and isn't followed by whitespace). If it is, the character pointer is rewound to the previous value (namely 'e' or 'E') and allowed to fall through to the rest of the function, which catches 'e' as an error just as it would any other letter, raising an ArgumentError exception. (In other words, by rewinding the pointer's value to 'e' we simply reduce the problem to one already solved for the other letters.)
This is my first patch to an open-source project, so if I screwed something up, please let me know (and please go easy on me :-).
--- ruby-orig/util.c 2006-02-08 12:01:22.000000000 -0800
+++ ruby/util.c 2006-02-08 12:34:58.000000000 -0800
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@
{
int sign, expSign = FALSE;
double fraction, dblExp, *d;
- register const char *p;
+ register const char *p, *temp;
register int c;
int exp = 0; /* Exponent read from "EX" field. */
int fracExp = 0; /* Exponent that derives from the fractional
@@ -835,22 +835,31 @@
* Skim off the exponent.
*/
- p = pExp;
+ p = temp = pExp;
if ((*p == 'E') || (*p == 'e')) {
p += 1;
- if (*p == '-') {
- expSign = TRUE;
- p += 1;
- }
+ /*
+ * If p has a trailing 'e', this is an error, so rewind p to
+ * previous value to treat 'e' like any other letter.
+ */
+ if (!*p || ISSPACE(*p)) {
+ p = temp;
+ }
else {
- if (*p == '+') {
+ if (*p == '-') {
+ expSign = TRUE;
p += 1;
- }
- expSign = FALSE;
- }
- while (ISDIGIT(*p)) {
- exp = exp * 10 + (*p - '0');
- p += 1;
+ }
+ else {
+ if (*p == '+') {
+ p += 1;
+ }
+ expSign = FALSE;
+ }
+ while (ISDIGIT(*p)) {
+ exp = exp * 10 + (*p - '0');
+ p += 1;
+ }
}
}
if (expSign) {
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=3503&group_id=426