ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#7271] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/01
[#7273] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

Hello.

[#7272] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — noreply@...

Bugs item #3399, was opened at 2006-01-31 22:25

3 messages 2006/02/01
[#7285] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3399 ] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

Hello.
[#7291] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3399 ] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — Blair Zajac <blair@...> 2006/02/02

H.Yamamoto wrote:

[#7274] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/02/01
[#7275] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "ocean" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

> Hello,
[#7276] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

> Can you test attached patch? If this is OK, I'll commit this.

[#7277] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

4 messages 2006/02/01
[#7278] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/01

Hello.
[#7279] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/01

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#7282] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

Hello.

[#7280] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/01
[#7283] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/02

[#7281] Symble syntax support of RDoc parser — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>

Hello!

2 messages 2006/02/02
[#7284] Re: [patch] Symble syntax support of RDoc parser — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/02

Hi,

[#7286] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@...

On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Minero Aoki wrote:

23 messages 2006/02/02
[#7289] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/02

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
[#7292] ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/02

[#7293] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/02

mathew wrote:
[#7298] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/02/03

mathew wrote:
[#7310] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
[#7311] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/07

On 2006.02.07 10:03, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7313] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

Umm, on what version are you seeing a warning there? I don't and never
[#7315] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/07

On 2006.02.07 14:47, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7316] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I'd by far prefer it never emit a warning. The warning is assumes you
[#7318] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7321] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/02/07

[#7322] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7324] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

I think you've hit the point exactly, -w is only really useful at
[#7327] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7325] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — WATANABE Hirofumi <eban@...> 2006/02/07

Hi,
[#7326] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, WATANABE Hirofumi wrote:
[#7317] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/07

On 2/7/06, Evan Webb <evanwebb@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7314] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/07

On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#7319] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — James Britt <ruby@...> 2006/02/07

Evan Webb wrote:
[#7320] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/07

On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, James Britt wrote:
[#7323] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273) — Evan Webb <evanwebb@...> 2006/02/07

Having never used VB, I had no idea it had a with. Well, then thats at
[#7296] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — Christian Boos <cboos@...> 2006/02/03

ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#7287] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/02/02
[#7288] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/02

On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#7290] meaningful RUBY_VERSION#<=> — "Ara.T.Howard" <ara.t.howard@...>

1 message 2006/02/02

[#7294] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7295] possible bug - does Socket.gethostbyname behave correctly? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Socket.gethostbyname gethostbyname(3), which is surprising. It can

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7297] YAML::quick_emit api change — ara.t.howard@...

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7300] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — noreply@...

Bugs item #3438, was opened at 2006-02-03 18:41

1 message 2006/02/03

[#7301] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/04
[#7302] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/04

Hello.

[#7303] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3438 ] (2**32).to_s(2) fails with exception on Redhat Opteron with gcc 3.4.3 compile — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/04

[#7304] PStore#fetch does not reture default value. — noreply@...

Bugs item #3453, was opened at 2006-02-05 12:40

1 message 2006/02/05

[#7305] Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:

28 messages 2006/02/05
[#7401] Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/22

On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7412] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/22

On Feb 21, 2006, at 9:21 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7414] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/23

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7427] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/26

Hi,
[#7429] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/26

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:45:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7430] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/26

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7432] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/27

In article <20060226171117.GB29508@tux-chan>,
[#7433] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/27

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 06:03:58PM +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7443] Re: [PATCH] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/28

> I've tried to fix the bug by partitioning the ID space as follows:
[#7431] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/26

[#7416] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/23

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 10:26:00AM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7428] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/26

In article <1140968746.321377.18843.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7444] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — nobu@... 2006/02/28

Hi,
[#7445] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <m1FDshr-0006MNC@Knoppix>,
[#7447] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <87irr047sx.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7448] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/28

In article <87vev0hxu5.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7465] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — "Evan Webb" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/01

Just my quick 2 cents...
[#7468] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/01

In article <92f5f81d0602281855g27e78f4eua8bf20e0b8e47b68@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7469] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — nobu@... 2006/03/01

Hi,
[#7471] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/02

In article <m1FESAD-0001blC@Knoppix>,
[#7472] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/03/02

Sorry for interruption.
[#7474] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/02

Hi,
[#7473] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/02

Hi,
[#7475] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/03/03

[#7477] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/03

In article <5F5E76F7-CA07-403E-8015-A43FBB0741C8@zenspider.com>,
[#7466] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3) — Kev Jackson <kevin.jackson@...> 2006/03/01

Evan Webb wrote:
[#7402] Vacation notice (was: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)) — wonado@... 2006/02/22

Liebe(r) Absender(in),

[#7306] Fwd: Is the SQLite3 gem known to have memory corruption? — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>

1 message 2006/02/05

[#7307] crash with ruby cvs head — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

2 messages 2006/02/06
[#7308] Re: crash with ruby cvs head — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/06

Hi,

[#7328] DRbObject.new(nil, nil) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

If the uri argument to DRbObject.new is nil, then the error raised is

2 messages 2006/02/08
[#7329] Re: DRbObject.new(nil, nil) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7330] Correction to string-to-float conversion of string with trailing 'e' — noreply@...

Patches item #3503, was opened at 2006-02-08 12:31

1 message 2006/02/08

[#7331] Set containing duplicates — noreply@...

Bugs item #3506, was opened at 2006-02-08 22:52

5 messages 2006/02/08
[#7332] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/08

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
[#7333] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#7334] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/08

Joel VanderWerf wrote:
[#7335] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3506 ] Set containing duplicates — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/02/09

On 2006.02.09 08:44, Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7336] SOAP errors for boolean types — peter anzalone <panzalone@...>

I have generated a SOAP client using wsdl2ruby.rb and have established

1 message 2006/02/09

[#7337] Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/02/11
[#7338] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/11

Hi,
[#7339] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/02/11

Am Sonntag, 12. Feb 2006, 01:34:55 +0900 schrieb Yukihiro Matsumoto:
[#7340] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/11

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7341] Re: Parse error within Regexp — dblack@... 2006/02/12

Hi --
[#7342] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/12

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:42:42AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7343] Re: Parse error within Regexp — dblack@... 2006/02/12

Hi --
[#7346] Re: Parse error within Regexp — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/12

On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 09:47:24PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7344] Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...>

Hi, all. This is my first time posting to this mailing list.

5 messages 2006/02/12
[#7345] Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2006/02/12

On Sunday 12 February 2006 15:14, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7348] Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7350] Re: Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...> 2006/02/13

[#7352] Re: Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 12, 2006, at 8:55 PM, Dae San Hwang wrote:

[#7347] Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>

It seems that the latest change to eval.c (1.616.2.154) has broken irb.

9 messages 2006/02/12
[#7349] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/13

Hi,
[#7354] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/13

Thanks, Matz.
[#7355] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/02/13

On Feb 13, 2006, at 2:42 PM, Kent Sibilev wrote:
[#7356] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/13

Yep, I've just rebuilt ri database with
[#7357] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/14

Hi,
[#7358] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/14

Yeah, I should have done it in the first place. I've check out it
[#7359] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/14

Hi,
[#7360] Re: Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...> 2006/02/14

Perfect. Thank you very much, it fixed compile problem and this one

[#7351] typo in net/ftp.rb documentation — noreply@...

Bugs item #3539, was opened at 2006-02-13 11:17

1 message 2006/02/13

[#7353] more restrictive options for test/unit/autorunner.rb ? — jonathan gold <dev@...>

is there a way, or interest in creating a way, to add switches to

1 message 2006/02/13

[#7361] Fcntl::Lock — ara.t.howard@...

1 message 2006/02/14

[#7362] undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...>

Hi,

3 messages 2006/02/14
[#7363] Re: undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — dblack@... 2006/02/14

Hi --
[#7387] Re: undefining Class.inherited makes class not subclassable anymore — Tilman Sauerbeck <tilman@...> 2006/02/18

dblack [2006-02-15 7:38]:

[#7364] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — noreply@...

Bugs item #3565, was opened at 2006-02-15 02:32

8 messages 2006/02/15
[#7365] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,
[#7371] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/15

[#7374] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,
[#7375] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/15

On Pr 2006-02-16 at 03:18 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7380] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/17

On Pr 2006-02-16 at 04:06 +0900, Ozgur Murat Homurlu wrote:
[#7381] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...> 2006/02/17

Sorry, resending the patch because its header is previously corrupted...
[#7388] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,

[#7366] OP_ASGN1 and OP_ASGN2 allow calling of private operators and problem with splat — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7367] Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

Hello,

2 messages 2006/02/15
[#7369] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,

[#7368] Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

I resend this because my mailer set incorrect Date.

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7370] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/02/15
[#7372] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/15

Hi,

[#7373] Re: Ruby 1.8 CVS miniruby core dumps — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/02/15

[#7376] Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2006/02/15
[#7379] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/17

Hi,
[#7382] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/02/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7384] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,
[#7389] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/18

In article <1140227235.788166.30546.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7391] Re: Minor tracer.rb patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,

[#7378] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Daniel Berger wrote:

1 message 2006/02/17

[#7383] minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>

Ruby 1.8.4

3 messages 2006/02/17
[#7385] Re: minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/02/18

Hi,
[#7386] Re: minor patch for fileutils.rb (fu_world_writeable?) — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/02/18

--- Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7392] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Dominik Bathon wrote:

3 messages 2006/02/18
[#7393] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — "Dominik Bathon" <dbatml@...> 2006/02/18

On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 18:42:03 +0100, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca>
[#7394] Re: patch for rational.rb (gcd) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/18

On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, Dominik Bathon wrote:

[#7395] Latest change to rational.rb — "Kent Sibilev" <ksruby@...>

Here's a small fix to

1 message 2006/02/20

[#7396] IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

5 messages 2006/02/20
[#7397] Re: IO#reopen — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/20

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602200406260.25048@web.artengine.ca>,
[#7398] Re: IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/20

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7399] Re: IO#reopen — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/02/20

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0602200419080.25048@web.artengine.ca>,
[#7400] Re: IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/20

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#7403] Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>

Hi List,

12 messages 2006/02/22
[#7405] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/22

On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 07:57:58PM +0900, Emiel van de Laar wrote:
[#7404] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — George Ogata <g_ogata@...> 2006/02/22

Emiel van de Laar <emiel@rednode.nl> writes:
[#7406] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — dblack@... 2006/02/22

Hi --
[#7407] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/02/22

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7409] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/02/22

[#7410] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — ara.t.howard@... 2006/02/22

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7408] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/02/22

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#7415] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — dblack@... 2006/02/23

Hi --
[#7411] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — George Ogata <g_ogata@...> 2006/02/22

dblack@wobblini.net writes:
[#7417] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/02/23

On 2/22/06, George Ogata <g_ogata@optushome.com.au> wrote:> dblack@wobblini.net writes:>> I'm still not happy about #funcall. How is one supposed to remember>> which (#send or #funcall) is which? There are a few things in Ruby>> where "you just have to memorize it" -- like the true/false arguments>> to #instance_methods, or the differences between Proc.new and lambda.>> I've always felt that these are soft spots in the language.>> #send/#funcall seems to me to be in the same category.> #funcall breaks the rules. That makes it "fun". ;-)
[#7413] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/02/22

Second! I've disliked 'funcall' since I first saw it. And why break send? I

[#7419] ping.rb — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

ping.rb has bothered me for a while for two reasons. First, it really ought

4 messages 2006/02/24
[#7425] Re: ping.rb — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/02/25

Pat Eyler wrote:
[#7420] Re: ping.rb — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/02/24

--- Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7421] Re: ping.rb — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/02/24

On 2/23/06, Daniel Berger <djberg96@yahoo.com> wrote:

[#7422] Syck fails with parse error on parsing multiple documents — noreply@...

Bugs item #3654, was opened at 2006-02-24 15:45

1 message 2006/02/24

[#7423] Rubygems/ri integration — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

I just added a patch to Rubygems that allows it to generate ri data

3 messages 2006/02/24
[#7426] Re: [PATCH] Rubygems/ri integration — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/02/26

[#7479] Re: [PATCH] Rubygems/ri integration — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/03

Hi,

[#7424] Passing wrong data type to Win32API#call causes segfault — noreply@...

Bugs item #3658, was opened at 2006-02-24 19:33

1 message 2006/02/25

[#7434] parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — David Smiley <dsmiley@...>

I have encountered a counter-intuitive bug in Ruby's parser. The

5 messages 2006/02/27
[#7436] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/02/27

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:05:17AM +0900, David Smiley wrote:
[#7441] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — David Smiley <dsmiley@...> 2006/02/27

First of all, I'd like to apologize because my bug report was
[#7435] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/27

>>>>> "D" == David Smiley <dsmiley@mitre.org> writes:
[#7437] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — Stefan Lang <langstefan@...> 2006/02/27

On Monday 27 February 2006 18:05, David Smiley wrote:

[#7438] Re: parser bug, function call without parens across multiple lines — "Yemi D. Bedu" <yemi@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/02/27

[#7439] FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — mathew <meta@...>

dnsbl/bl.spamcop.net returned deny: for

3 messages 2006/02/27
[#7440] Re: FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — "Justin Bailey" <jgbailey@...> 2006/02/27

This is fairly serious as it breaks Google Groups/Ruby Talk list
[#7464] Re: FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/03/01

On 2/27/06, Justin Bailey <jgbailey@gmail.com> wrote:> This is fairly serious as it breaks Google Groups/Ruby Talk list> integration, right?

[#7442] GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...>

I have been posting to the ruby-talk mailing list about ruby memory and GC, and I think it's ready

17 messages 2006/02/27
[#7446] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.
[#7449] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.
[#7450] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Sorry, I lied...
[#7451] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7452] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

[#7453] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7454] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

[#7455] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "H" == H Yamamoto <ocean@m2.ccsnet.ne.jp> writes:
[#7462] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

H.Yamamoto wrote:
[#7456] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

Attempting to apply patch to array.c from 1.8.4 I get:
[#7458] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7459] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/02/28

ts wrote:
[#7461] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/02/28

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7463] Re: GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...> 2006/03/01

ts wrote:
[#7467] Re: GC Question — ts <decoux@...> 2006/03/01

>>>>> "z" == zdennis <zdennis@mktec.com> writes:
[#7457] Re: GC Question — "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp> 2006/02/28

Hello.

[#7460] rails segfaults at 2nd load with eval.c: No such file or directory. — noreply@...

Bugs item #3683, was opened at 2006-02-28 10:33

1 message 2006/02/28

Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)

From: James Britt <ruby@...>
Date: 2006-02-07 15:18:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #7319 
Evan Webb wrote:
> I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
> the programmers context in a way that we might not want to have to
> explain constantly. I can just hear the questions now...
> 
> "Why are my method calls inside a with being executed on the wrong object?"
> 
> "Well, thats because with changes self for it's body, and so you have
> to be careful what you call in there."

VB users never seemed to have a problem with the concept of 'with', and 
I think it unlikely Ruby users would, either.

> 
> repeat..
> 
> While the more hardcore of us are use to using blocks to enter into
> new and strange contexts (module_eval/class_eval/instance_eval oh
> my!), pushing this to the normal user is not a decision that should be
> made lightly.


Using blocks *is* normal Ruby usage.

I think you serous underestimate what people can understand and 
correctly use.

James

In This Thread

Prev Next