[#7271] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7272] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — noreply@...
Bugs item #3399, was opened at 2006-01-31 22:25
[#7274] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7277] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7280] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
[#7286] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@...
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Minero Aoki wrote:
mathew wrote:
mathew wrote:
I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
On 2006.02.07 10:03, Evan Webb wrote:
Umm, on what version are you seeing a warning there? I don't and never
On 2006.02.07 14:47, Evan Webb wrote:
I'd by far prefer it never emit a warning. The warning is assumes you
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7305] Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:45:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
In article <20060226171117.GB29508@tux-chan>,
In article <1140968746.321377.18843.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
Hi,
In article <m1FDshr-0006MNC@Knoppix>,
In article <87irr047sx.fsf@m17n.org>,
In article <87vev0hxu5.fsf@m17n.org>,
Just my quick 2 cents...
In article <92f5f81d0602281855g27e78f4eua8bf20e0b8e47b68@mail.gmail.com>,
Hi,
In article <m1FESAD-0001blC@Knoppix>,
Hi,
[#7331] Set containing duplicates — noreply@...
Bugs item #3506, was opened at 2006-02-08 22:52
[#7337] Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7344] Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...>
Hi, all. This is my first time posting to this mailing list.
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7347] Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>
It seems that the latest change to eval.c (1.616.2.154) has broken irb.
Hi,
Thanks, Matz.
[#7364] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — noreply@...
Bugs item #3565, was opened at 2006-02-15 02:32
Hi,
Hi,
On Pr 2006-02-16 at 03:18 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7376] Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
[#7396] IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#7403] Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>
Hi List,
Emiel van de Laar <emiel@rednode.nl> writes:
Hi --
[#7439] FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — mathew <meta@...>
dnsbl/bl.spamcop.net returned deny: for
[#7442] GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...>
I have been posting to the ruby-talk mailing list about ruby memory and GC, and I think it's ready
Hello.
Hello.
Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Caleb Clausen <vikkous@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > 100_000.times{|n|
> > o=Object.new;
> > i=o.__id__;
> > o2=ObjectSpace._id2ref(i);
> > o.equal? o2 or raise "o=#{o}, i=#{"%x"%i}, o2=#{o2.inspect}, n=#{n}"
> > }
> >
> > The exception should never be raised. On my OS X 10.3.9 system (and at
> > least 1 other) it does get eventually raised after a few hundred
> > iterations using ruby 1.8 and 1.9. With the (apple-supplied) ruby 1.6,
> > it does not happen. Tests on several Windows and Linux systems have
> > never observed a problem, using ruby 1.8 and 1.9. I don't know if it's
> > a problem on OS X 10.4; I don't have access to any 10.4 systems.
> >
> > The problem seems to be in the call to __id__. Usually, it works
> > correctly, but every once in a while it returns the id of some random
> > symbol. Does anyone know why this is happening?
>
> I can reproduce on ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-darwin7.9.0]:
>
> o=#<Object:0x1d421c>, i=ea10e, o2=:reject, n=448 (RuntimeError)
>
> It looks like the object id wrapped in some way and now points to a
> symbol? Clearly looks like a bug.
0x1d421c.to_s(2) # => "111010100001000011100"
0xea10e.to_s(2) # => "11101010000100001110"
0xea10e.class # => Fixnum
(2 * 0xea10e).to_s(2) # => "111010100001000011100"
So far so good.
Now, in gc.c:
static VALUE
id2ref(obj, id)
VALUE obj, id;
{
unsigned long ptr, p0;
rb_secure(4);
p0 = ptr = NUM2ULONG(id);
if (ptr == Qtrue) return Qtrue;
if (ptr == Qfalse) return Qfalse;
if (ptr == Qnil) return Qnil;
if (FIXNUM_P(ptr)) return (VALUE)ptr;
if (SYMBOL_P(ptr) && rb_id2name(SYM2ID((VALUE)ptr)) != 0) {
return (VALUE)ptr;
}
(SYMBOL_FLAG == 0x0e)
NUM2ULONG is rb_num2ulong, which calls rb_num2long, which uses FIX2LONG.
id was 111010100001000011101b and ptr becomes 11101010000100001110b, which
matches the SYMBOL_FLAG.
I'd conjecture that the above works on Linux because glibc's malloc() always
returns 8-byte aligned memory addresses, which doesn't seem to be the case in
OSX:
0x1d421c % 8 # => 4
Another possibility would be that the address space for the data segment
used in OSX is lower than on Linux, so the SYM2ID matches an existent
symbol:
RUBY_PLATFORM # => "i686-linux"
Object.new.inspect # => "#<Object:0xb7d44d7c>"
0xb7d44d7c >> 9 # => 6023718
# we shouldn't have 6 million symbols
0x1d421c >> 9 # => 3745
# but 4000 are indeed possible
The relevant code hasn't changed between 1.6 and 1.8; could it be that the
Apple-supplied 1.6 binary was built specially to use 8-byte alignment, or
that the memory layout has changed in the meantime?
If so, possible fixes would include:
* modifying the configure to use the magic options
* using posix_memalign or such
--
Mauricio Fernandez