[#7500] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL

16 messages 2006/03/10

[#7553] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — noreply@...

Bugs item #3843, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:09

27 messages 2006/03/16
[#7554] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — nobu@... 2006/03/16

Hi,

[#7557] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — 卜部昌平 <shyouhei@...> 2006/03/16

Nobu, you are not answering to the question.... You have to unveil why

[#7559] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/16

Hi,

[#7560] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/16

Hello,

[#7565] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#7566] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#7567] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Brian Mitchell wrote:

[#7568] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#7614] PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...>

A simply change (changing all references of "Pathname.new" to

19 messages 2006/03/27
[#7618] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603262350k796fe48fp2224b9f2108ac507@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7619] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/27

Quite right on the .glob and .getwd. I guess the tests don't test hit

[#7620] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603270903g2fb02244i6a395be708dfffa3@mail.gmail.com>,

Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)

From: "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
Date: 2006-03-02 04:22:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #7472
Sorry for interruption.

>I updated the patch to support environments sizeof(RVALUE)
>is not multiples of 5, such as windows.
>(pointed by kosako: http://d.hatena.ne.jp/kkos/20060228#1141128641)

On VisualC++, this patch changes sizeof(RVALUE) to 20.

Index: gc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/gc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.233
diff -u -w -b -p -r1.233 gc.c
--- gc.c	13 Feb 2006 04:53:21 -0000	1.233
+++ gc.c	2 Mar 2006 04:12:31 -0000
@@ -310,6 +310,8 @@ rb_global_variable(VALUE *var)
     rb_gc_register_address(var);
 }
 
+#pragma pack(push, 1)
+
 typedef struct RVALUE {
     union {
 	struct {
@@ -339,6 +341,8 @@ typedef struct RVALUE {
 #endif
 } RVALUE;
 
+#pragma pack(pop)
+
 static RVALUE *freelist = 0;
 static RVALUE *deferred_final_list = 0;
 

//////////

Probably even this works on VisualC++, still
should not depend on 20byte alignment though. Just for tips. :-)



In This Thread