[#7476] Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Can a Net::HTTP guru comment on this message:
[#7485] Bugzilla for ruby? — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#7493] how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
Hello,
[#7497] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
Hello,
[#7500] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL
The columns store the actual values (doubles), and the rows store pointers to the corresponding doubles. This way, I can update a double directly via the columns, via the rows after dereferencing the pointers.
[#7518] Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#7524] Sefe level: bug or feature? — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
Why cannot do eval with $SAFE=3 and can with $SAFE=4? Is it bug or
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7529] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#7546] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
In Ruby, there's the []= and [] operators which you can define together.
[#7553] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — noreply@...
Bugs item #3843, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:09
Hi,
Nobu, you are not answering to the question.... You have to unveil why
Hi,
Hello,
Zev Blut wrote:
On 3/16/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
On 3/16/06, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote:
Hello,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Brian Mitchell wrote:
On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Dear all
What you've described is the basic predence difference between
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7600] ruby_script ? — "Nicolas Despr鑚" <nicolas.despres@...>
Hi list,
>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
On 3/25/06, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#7601] to_str, to_s and StringValue — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...>
If I understand correctly, StringValue is a way for writing duck-type
[#7614] PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...>
A simply change (changing all references of "Pathname.new" to
In article <92f5f81d0603262350k796fe48fp2224b9f2108ac507@mail.gmail.com>,
Quite right on the .glob and .getwd. I guess the tests don't test hit
In article <92f5f81d0603270903g2fb02244i6a395be708dfffa3@mail.gmail.com>,
In article <87fyl3x0wd.fsf@m17n.org>,
Hm, well, thats because of the shortcut behavior in Pathname#+ which
In article <92f5f81d0603271717r1ce51d30p6c28e363dc32a09b@mail.gmail.com>,
rdoc patch - multiline constants
Hi,
The following patch corrects RDoc's handling of multiline constants.
The following are now correctly parsed:
----
A = [
1,
2,
3
]
B = {
1 => 'foo',
2 => 'bar'
}
C = proc do |x|
x+1
end
----
A couple questions:
1. Is there any body of ``standard'' tests for rdoc?
2. This patch does not solve any bug report. Should I submit a bug report?
The patch is a unified diff to lib/rdoc/parsers/parse_rb.rb against
the latest CVS version (1.42).
I understand you are all busy but I would appreciate an acknowledge of
this and my previous patch. Just a note to let me know someone who
can approve them into the CVS tree has seen them and will process
them.
Thanks,
c.
--- parse_rb.rb 2006-03-30 19:55:09.000000000 -0600
+++ parse_rb.new 2006-03-30 19:53:19.000000000 -0600
@@ -1845,9 +1845,9 @@
case tk
when TkSEMICOLON
break
- when TkLPAREN, TkfLPAREN
+ when TkLPAREN, TkfLPAREN, TkLBRACE, TkLBRACK, TkDO
nest += 1
- when TkRPAREN
+ when TkRPAREN, TkRBRACE, TkRBRACK, TkEND
nest -= 1
when TkCOMMENT
if nest <= 0 && @scanner.lex_state == EXPR_END
@@ -1855,7 +1855,8 @@
break
end
when TkNL
- if (@scanner.lex_state == EXPR_END and nest <= 0) ||
!@scanner.continue
+# if (@scanner.lex_state == EXPR_END and nest <= 0) ||
!@scanner.continue
+ if (nest <= 0) && ((@scanner.lex_state == EXPR_END) ||
(!@scanner.continue))
unget_tk(tk)
break
end