[#7500] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL

16 messages 2006/03/10

[#7553] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — noreply@...

Bugs item #3843, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:09

27 messages 2006/03/16
[#7554] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — nobu@... 2006/03/16

Hi,

[#7557] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — 卜部昌平 <shyouhei@...> 2006/03/16

Nobu, you are not answering to the question.... You have to unveil why

[#7559] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/16

Hi,

[#7560] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/16

Hello,

[#7565] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#7566] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#7567] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Brian Mitchell wrote:

[#7568] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:

[#7614] PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...>

A simply change (changing all references of "Pathname.new" to

19 messages 2006/03/27
[#7618] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603262350k796fe48fp2224b9f2108ac507@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7619] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/27

Quite right on the .glob and .getwd. I guess the tests don't test hit

[#7620] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603270903g2fb02244i6a395be708dfffa3@mail.gmail.com>,

Re: Bugzilla for ruby?

From: Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Date: 2006-03-06 11:26:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #7489
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:43:49AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> 
> This is the one I use (note: it's in Japanese).
> 
>   http://mput.dip.jp/rubybugs/superuser.html


Sorry, but my knowledge in Japanese is limited to about three
words, and I can't read any japanese characters. What about a bug
database in english?



> When a report is post to the list, this list is updated by
> volunteers.


I recently posted a comment about ipaddr.rb, which is not exactly
buggy, but not really well-designed and up to date, and would require
some re-design. The comment seems to be completely lost. 

A bug database has the ability to keep track of feature requests and
things like that. It also has the ability to have parts of the
projects (e.g. all those ruby-extensions) maintained by different
maintainers. 


> Bugzilla is too big, and did not make me happy.  I may be wrong.  If
> so, please enlighten me.

I have never installed Bugzilla, I am just using it to report bugs to
about a dozen different projects. At least, it works and allows the
bug reporter to see, whether there were any comments or replies. 

However, there are other bug databases with less weight.


> I don't need yet another channel to post
> bugs.  Current mailing lists are fine. I just need to keep truck of
> the bugs reported to the lists.


But maybe the need to subscribe to the mailing list and to keep track
with all that medium-bandwidth postings is what keeps people from
reporting bugs. You can't report a bug and see what happens without
buying all the rest of the mailing list at the same time. And I am
still under the impression that things might get lost. 

And, btw, if there are security issues, they might require a more
secret and more reliable treatment. Don't get me wrong, but such a
mailing list still appears a little bit home-brewn-alike. Nearly all
professional projects use any form of bug database with a user
interface. 

Maybe you don't even need to setup your own. I believe there are some
Bugzilla databases which are open for other open-source projects.

regards
Hadmut
 

In This Thread