[#7476] Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Can a Net::HTTP guru comment on this message:
[#7485] Bugzilla for ruby? — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
[#7493] how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
Hello,
[#7497] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
Hello,
[#7500] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL
The columns store the actual values (doubles), and the rows store pointers to the corresponding doubles. This way, I can update a double directly via the columns, via the rows after dereferencing the pointers.
[#7518] Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
[#7524] Sefe level: bug or feature? — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>
Why cannot do eval with $SAFE=3 and can with $SAFE=4? Is it bug or
Hi,
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7529] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
> -----Original Message-----
[#7546] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>
In Ruby, there's the []= and [] operators which you can define together.
[#7553] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — noreply@...
Bugs item #3843, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:09
Hi,
Nobu, you are not answering to the question.... You have to unveil why
Hi,
Hello,
Zev Blut wrote:
On 3/16/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
On 3/16/06, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote:
Hello,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Brian Mitchell wrote:
On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
Dear all
What you've described is the basic predence difference between
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7600] ruby_script ? — "Nicolas Despr鑚" <nicolas.despres@...>
Hi list,
>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
On 3/25/06, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#7601] to_str, to_s and StringValue — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...>
If I understand correctly, StringValue is a way for writing duck-type
[#7614] PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...>
A simply change (changing all references of "Pathname.new" to
In article <92f5f81d0603262350k796fe48fp2224b9f2108ac507@mail.gmail.com>,
Quite right on the .glob and .getwd. I guess the tests don't test hit
In article <92f5f81d0603270903g2fb02244i6a395be708dfffa3@mail.gmail.com>,
In article <87fyl3x0wd.fsf@m17n.org>,
Hm, well, thats because of the shortcut behavior in Pathname#+ which
In article <92f5f81d0603271717r1ce51d30p6c28e363dc32a09b@mail.gmail.com>,
Re: Bugzilla for ruby?
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:43:49AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > > This is the one I use (note: it's in Japanese). > > http://mput.dip.jp/rubybugs/superuser.html Sorry, but my knowledge in Japanese is limited to about three words, and I can't read any japanese characters. What about a bug database in english? > When a report is post to the list, this list is updated by > volunteers. I recently posted a comment about ipaddr.rb, which is not exactly buggy, but not really well-designed and up to date, and would require some re-design. The comment seems to be completely lost. A bug database has the ability to keep track of feature requests and things like that. It also has the ability to have parts of the projects (e.g. all those ruby-extensions) maintained by different maintainers. > Bugzilla is too big, and did not make me happy. I may be wrong. If > so, please enlighten me. I have never installed Bugzilla, I am just using it to report bugs to about a dozen different projects. At least, it works and allows the bug reporter to see, whether there were any comments or replies. However, there are other bug databases with less weight. > I don't need yet another channel to post > bugs. Current mailing lists are fine. I just need to keep truck of > the bugs reported to the lists. But maybe the need to subscribe to the mailing list and to keep track with all that medium-bandwidth postings is what keeps people from reporting bugs. You can't report a bug and see what happens without buying all the rest of the mailing list at the same time. And I am still under the impression that things might get lost. And, btw, if there are security issues, they might require a more secret and more reliable treatment. Don't get me wrong, but such a mailing list still appears a little bit home-brewn-alike. Nearly all professional projects use any form of bug database with a user interface. Maybe you don't even need to setup your own. I believe there are some Bugzilla databases which are open for other open-source projects. regards Hadmut