From: Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Date: 2006-03-16T09:05:37+09:00
Subject: Re: Proposal: String#notempty?

Am Mittwoch, 15. M�r 2006, 22:19:50 +0900 schrieb dblack@wobblini.net:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> 
> >class String
> > def complexity
> >   scan(/\w+|./).uniq.length
> > end
> >end
> 
> I see the point about speed, but I'm not clear on what the
> "complexity" thing is supposed to be demonstrating -- ?

I just looked for an amusing way to express that "nonempty?"
is easiear to read than "[/.+/mn]".

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de