ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#7470] In a highly dynamic ObjectSpace (loads of created and collected objects) YAML creates erroneous anchors/references — noreply@...

Bugs item #3698, was opened at 2006-03-01 19:10

1 message 2006/03/01

[#7476] Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

Can a Net::HTTP guru comment on this message:

4 messages 2006/03/03
[#7482] Re: Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/03/04

On Mar 2, 2006, at 8:36 PM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#7483] Re: Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/03/04

On Mar 4, 2006, at 10:59 AM, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#7484] Re: Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4? — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2006/03/05

Hi,

[#7478] Re: [Ruby 1.8.4] Bug report for File.expand_path — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/03/03
[#7481] Re: [Ruby 1.8.4] Bug report for File.expand_path — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/03/04

Hello,

[#7480] — 橋本 一人 <hasimoto@...3.dion.ne.jp>

# chaddr hasimoto@s3.dion.ne.jp hasimoto.kazuhito@gmail.com

1 message 2006/03/04

[#7485] Bugzilla for ruby? — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2006/03/05
[#7486] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/05

Hi,
[#7487] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — "Meador Inge" <meadori@...> 2006/03/05

Is the bug tracker at RubyForge (
[#7488] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/05

Hi,
[#7491] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — "Zachary P. Landau" <kapheine@...> 2006/03/07

> |I didn't see any bug management database on the ruby web site.
[#7489] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...> 2006/03/06

On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 02:43:49AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7490] Re: Bugzilla for ruby? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/03/06

On Mar 6, 2006, at 3:26 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7492] break semantics from lambdas and methods — Wayne Kelly <w.kelly@...>

Hi All,

2 messages 2006/03/09
[#7520] Re: break semantics from lambdas and methods — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/12

On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Wayne Kelly wrote:

[#7493] how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2006/03/09
[#7494] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/09

Geert,
[#7496] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/10

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7495] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/10

On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:

[#7497] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

Hello,

9 messages 2006/03/10
[#7499] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/03/10

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:
[#7510] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/11

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#7533] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/13

>Instead, partition both your vectorspaces as direct sums of smaller
[#7539] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/13

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:
[#7540] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/13

[#7509] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/11

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:
[#7516] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — ara.t.howard@... 2006/03/11

On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#7517] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/12

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:

[#7498] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

2. It's also possible to construct things that are pointers to variables

2 messages 2006/03/10
[#7513] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/11

On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:

[#7500] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL

16 messages 2006/03/10
[#7535] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/13

>I think you are saying that the rows of your matrix contain the value,
[#7538] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/13

>Well, consider that in a perfect world with zero storage overhead, you'd
[#7545] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/14

[#7502] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/10

See below.
[#7504] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/03/10

Geert Fannes wrote:
[#7505] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/10

>This is sort of wrong. Remember that in ruby, like java, most things
[#7501] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@...> 2006/03/10

> The problem with the code you sent is that you have to go through ALL
[#7503] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/10

I did of course wrap the c-implemented sparse matrix as a Ruby object, but that can handle only doubles (which is nice most of the time) and needs a c compiler and ruby sources etc to be installed. For portability reasons, it would be nice to have a pure Ruby implementation.
[#7506] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/10

The columns store the actual values (doubles), and the rows store pointers to the corresponding doubles. This way, I can update a double directly via the columns, via the rows after dereferencing the pointers.
[#7507] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/03/10

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#7511] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/03/11

If I am understanding correctly, the columns would contain the actual
[#7512] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/03/11

If you wanted to be even trickier, you could just use [i,j] as the key and
[#7514] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/03/11

Gah, ok, so I made a small mistake. That should be @row_number..
[#7534] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...> 2006/03/13

>I see your conundrum. However I think it should be possible to do what you
[#7537] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/13

Geert Fannes wrote:

[#7508] small clarification for ruby man page — David Lutterkort <dlutter@...>

The attached patch (against latest CVS) clarifies that directories from

2 messages 2006/03/10
[#7515] Re: [PATCH] small clarification for ruby man page — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/11

Hi,

[#7518] Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2006/03/12
[#7519] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/12

How is this better than doing "not str.empty?".
[#7521] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/12

Hi Evan,
[#7542] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — George Ogata <g_ogata@...> 2006/03/14

Bertram Scharpf <lists@bertram-scharpf.de> writes:
[#7543] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/14

Hi,
[#7522] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — nobu@... 2006/03/13

Hi,
[#7523] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/13

Hi,

[#7524] Sefe level: bug or feature? — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...>

Why cannot do eval with $SAFE=3 and can with $SAFE=4? Is it bug or

9 messages 2006/03/13
[#7525] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/13

Hi,
[#7526] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — "Kirill A. Shutemov" <k.shutemov@...> 2006/03/13

On 22:43 Mon 13 Mar, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7527] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/13

On Mon, 13 Mar 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7528] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/03/13

Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> writes:
[#7530] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/13

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
[#7531] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/13

Hi,
[#7532] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/03/13

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#7562] Re: Sefe level: bug or feature? — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2006/03/16

Christian Neukirchen wrote:

[#7529] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

6 messages 2006/03/13
[#7536] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/13

Hi,
[#7544] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — nobu@... 2006/03/14

Hi,
[#7549] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/14

Am Dienstag, 14. M舐 2006, 12:02:45 +0900 schrieb nobu@ruby-lang.org:
[#7550] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — dblack@... 2006/03/15

Hi --
[#7552] Re: Proposal: String#notempty? — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/03/16

Am Mittwoch, 15. M舐 2006, 22:19:50 +0900 schrieb dblack@wobblini.net:

[#7541] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Yemi D. Bedu" <yemi@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/03/13

[#7546] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — "Geert Fannes" <Geert.Fannes@...>

In Ruby, there's the []= and [] operators which you can define together.

4 messages 2006/03/14
[#7547] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — ara.t.howard@... 2006/03/14

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:
[#7548] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/14

On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 ara.t.howard@noaa.gov wrote:
[#7556] Re: how to introduce reference objects into ruby — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/16

On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Geert Fannes wrote:

[#7551] xmlrpc client and php xmlrpc servers — noreply@...

Bugs item #3842, was opened at 2006-03-15 23:45

1 message 2006/03/15

[#7553] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — noreply@...

Bugs item #3843, was opened at 2006-03-15 22:09

27 messages 2006/03/16
[#7554] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — nobu@... 2006/03/16

Hi,
[#7557] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — 卜部昌平 <shyouhei@...> 2006/03/16

Nobu, you are not answering to the question.... You have to unveil why
[#7559] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/16

Hi,
[#7560] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/16

Hello,
[#7569] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/03/16

Zev Blut wrote:
[#7570] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Wilson Bilkovich" <wilsonb@...> 2006/03/17

On 3/16/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#7572] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/17

On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:13:16 +0900, Wilson Bilkovich <wilsonb@gmail.com>
[#7574] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/17

Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
[#7575] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/03/17

mathew wrote:
[#7561] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, Zev Blut <rubyzbibd@ubit.com> wrote:
[#7563] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/16

Hello,
[#7564] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/03/16

On Mar 16, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Zev Blut wrote:
[#7573] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Zev Blut" <rubyzbibd@...> 2006/03/17

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:39:01 +0900, James Edward Gray II
[#7565] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7566] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#7567] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/16

Brian Mitchell wrote:
[#7568] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...> 2006/03/16

On 3/16/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#7582] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/03/19

Dear all
[#7586] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/19

What you've described is the basic predence difference between
[#7587] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/03/19

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7588] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/20

Huh. Correct you are. In addition, def won't accept && as a method
[#7592] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...> 2006/03/20

Good thaughts and explanations, I really like to descend to that level of
[#7597] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — mathew <meta@...> 2006/03/21
[#7591] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/03/20

On 3/19/06, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7576] Re: [OT] Rant about keyword logical operators was : (Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error) — "Dave Burt" <dave@...> 2006/03/17

Jim Weirich said:
[#7555] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3843 ] "not" operator used in expression that is a method parameter can generate syntax error — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/16

On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#7558] RCR 320: Extend Rational to interoperate better with floats — "Dave Burt" <dave@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/03/16

[#7571] The latest ruby 1.8 CVS breaks openssl compilation on win32 — ville.mattila@...

This patch seems to fix it.

1 message 2006/03/17

[#7577] BigDecimal#to_d — "Dave Burt" <dave@...>

BigDecimal has no to_d method, although it adds conversion methods for other

1 message 2006/03/17

[#7578] strange Kernel#exec behavior with bash's source command — noreply@...

Bugs item #3856, was opened at 2006-03-17 17:49

2 messages 2006/03/17
[#8402] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3856 ] strange Kernel#exec behavior with bash's source command — nobu@... 2006/07/26

Hi,

[#7579] possible bug in parse.y? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I don't have a repro on this, but I saw it while debugging some of my

2 messages 2006/03/18
[#7580] Re: possible bug in parse.y? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/18

Hi,

[#7581] Kernel#executed_directly? — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>

It would make the __FILE__ == $0 idiom more obvious:

2 messages 2006/03/19
[#7583] Re: [RCR] Kernel#executed_directly? — dblack@... 2006/03/19

Hi --

[#7584] [PATCH] rdoc for String#=~ — noreply@...

Bugs item #3866, was opened at 2006-03-19 14:18

1 message 2006/03/19

[#7585] async thread wakeup — Joshua Haberman <joshua@...>

I emailed ruby-core about this a while back, but got no response, so

3 messages 2006/03/19
[#7589] Re: [PATCH] async thread wakeup — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/03/20

Hi,
[#7590] Re: [PATCH] async thread wakeup — Joshua Haberman <joshua@...> 2006/03/20

[#7593] File.split on windows box appends a '.' to directory name — Jim Weirich <jim@...>

I'm exploring file path manipulation and discovered that on a windows box:

1 message 2006/03/20

[#7594] Re: File.split on windows box appends a '.' to directory name — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/03/20
[#7595] Re: File.split on windows box appends a '.' to directory name — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/03/20

Berger, Daniel wrote:

[#7596] Re: File.split on windows box appends a '.' to directory name — "Yemi D. Bedu" <yemi@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/03/20

[#7598] Two openssl+static build problems... — Stephen Waits <steve@...>

In attempting to build a completely static ruby, I've discovered a few

1 message 2006/03/21

[#7599] soap error when processing wsdl file — noreply@...

Bugs item #3886, was opened at 2006-03-22 01:26

1 message 2006/03/22

[#7600] ruby_script ? — "Nicolas Despr鑚" <nicolas.despres@...>

Hi list,

8 messages 2006/03/24
[#7604] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — ts <decoux@...> 2006/03/25

>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#7606] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — "Nicolas Despr鑚" <nicolas.despres@...> 2006/03/25

On 3/25/06, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote:
[#7607] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — ts <decoux@...> 2006/03/25

>>>>> "N" == Nicolas Despr=E8s?= <ISO-8859-1> writes:
[#7608] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/25

Hi,
[#7609] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2006/03/27

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#7610] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/27

Hi,
[#7615] Re: [BUG] ruby_script ? — ts <decoux@...> 2006/03/27

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#7601] to_str, to_s and StringValue — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...>

If I understand correctly, StringValue is a way for writing duck-type

4 messages 2006/03/25
[#7602] Re: [PATCH] to_str, to_s and StringValue — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/25

On Sat, 25 Mar 2006, Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido wrote:
[#7603] Re: [PATCH] to_str, to_s and StringValue — "Gerardo Santana Gez Garrido" <gerardo.santana@...> 2006/03/25

2006/3/24, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca>:
[#7605] Re: [PATCH] to_str, to_s and StringValue — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/25

Hi,

[#7611] Tricky block args — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

Hello again from the JRuby project!

3 messages 2006/03/27
[#7612] Re: Tricky block args — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/27

Hi,
[#7613] Re: Tricky block args — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/03/27

That is very good to hear. This short-cut behavior seems counter intuitive

[#7614] PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...>

A simply change (changing all references of "Pathname.new" to

19 messages 2006/03/27
[#7618] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603262350k796fe48fp2224b9f2108ac507@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7619] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/27

Quite right on the .glob and .getwd. I guess the tests don't test hit
[#7620] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/27

In article <92f5f81d0603270903g2fb02244i6a395be708dfffa3@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7621] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/27

I think that this behavior is perfectly acceptable. The return value
[#7622] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/03/27

Alright, heres a new patch with the glob and getwd fixed (with 2 tests
[#7627] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/28

In article <87fyl3x0wd.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7628] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/28

Hm, well, thats because of the shortcut behavior in Pathname#+ which
[#7629] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/28

Here's one that fixes + and join to always return an instance of self.class.
[#7630] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/03/28

In article <92f5f81d0603271717r1ce51d30p6c28e363dc32a09b@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7631] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/28

The reciever class is the potentially the one thats been subclassed,
[#7632] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/03/28

On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7633] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/28

On 3/27/06, Mathieu Bouchard <matju@artengine.ca> wrote:
[#7634] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/03/28

[#7624] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/03/27

Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#7625] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Evan Phoenix" <evanwebb@...> 2006/03/27

They should. They are singleton methods, so self.class is Class. I
[#7676] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/04/04

In article <92f5f81d0603271742t2996c3ebub91163d150818b5f@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7677] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/04/04

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7678] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/04/04

In article <Pine.LNX.4.58.0604041305530.11096@web.artengine.ca>,

[#7616] Buffer error installing gems using Zlib 1.2.1 on Windows — noreply@...

Bugs item #3927, was opened at 2006-03-27 14:59

1 message 2006/03/27

[#7617] Re: PATCH: A subclassable Pathname — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/03/27

[#7623] JRuby update, while I'm here — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>

As long as we're on the subject, I thought I'd toss out a little update

2 messages 2006/03/27
[#7626] Re: JRuby update, while I'm here — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/03/27

Sorry about the missend on this one.

[#7635] rdoc bug fix [3863] - URL matching — "Chris Alfeld" <chris.alfeld@...>

I sent this to ruby-doc and it vanished into the ether (as a

1 message 2006/03/28

[#7636] RDoc patch - 3863 & 3930 — "Chris Alfeld" <chris.alfeld@...>

Here's a second version of the patch which also fixes bug 3930, namely:

4 messages 2006/03/28
[#7637] Re: RDoc patch - 3863 & 3930 — "Chris Alfeld" <chris.alfeld@...> 2006/03/28

Ick, sorry; got an intermediate (and unnecessary) change in the last patch.
[#7638] Re: RDoc patch - 3863 & 3930 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/03/28

Hi,
[#7639] Re: RDoc patch - 3863 & 3930 — "Chris Alfeld" <chris.alfeld@...> 2006/03/28

> Thank you for the patch, but could you repost it in unified diff

[#7640] 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...>

We've attempted to build 1.8.4 on HP-UX 11.23/IA with GCC 3.4.3:

3 messages 2006/03/28
[#7642] Re: 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...> 2006/03/29

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:44:47AM +0900, Albert Chin wrote:
[#7641] Re: 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...> 2006/03/28

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 07:44:47AM +0900, Albert Chin wrote:

[#7643] Re: 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I had some trouble compiling on my ia64 although it was not the same

2 messages 2006/03/29
[#7644] Re: 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — Albert Chin <ruby-core@...> 2006/03/29

On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:28:30AM +0900, Overdorf, Sam wrote:

[#7645] additions to matrix.rb — "Diego Virasoro" <diego.virasoro@...>

Hello,

1 message 2006/03/29

[#7646] Re: 1.8.4 on HP-UX/IA64 — "Overdorf, Sam" <sam.overdorf@...>

I just built:

1 message 2006/03/29

[#7647] rdoc patch - multiline constants — "Chris Alfeld" <chris.alfeld@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/03/31
[#7651] Re: rdoc patch - horiz lines in plain text files — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/03/31

[#7648] Net::Imap error with Courier mail server — noreply@...

Bugs item #3983, was opened at 2006-03-30 22:02

1 message 2006/03/31

[#7649] BUG? Ruby 1.8.4 readpartial oddities — ville.mattila@...

Hello Core,

1 message 2006/03/31

[#7650] to_f failes where it should still succeed for string representing very big float — noreply@...

Bugs item #3993, was opened at 2006-03-31 18:23

1 message 2006/03/31

[#7652] Too much recursion when specifying backtrace info for exceptions — Aaron Schrab <aaron@...>

I'm using an AMD64 system running the Debian sarge (stable)

1 message 2006/03/31

Re: Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4?

From: Minero Aoki <aamine@...>
Date: 2006-03-05 09:41:52 UTC
List: ruby-core #7484 
Hi,

  In mail "Re: Net::HTTP Bug in Ruby 1.8.4?"
  James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:

> > Can a Net::HTTP guru comment on this message:
> >
> > [ruby-talk:182360]
> >
> > How we found a bug here?
> 
> Well, I've looked into this some more myself.  I do believe this is a  
> bug.  Here's the code in the current Net::HTTP causing the issue,  
> starting on line 1507:

Thank you very much.
I have commited your fix now.

Best Regards,
Minero Aoki

In This Thread

Prev Next