[#7271] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
2 messages
2006/02/01
[#7272] [PATCH] OS X core dumps when $0 is changed and then loads shared libraries — noreply@...
Bugs item #3399, was opened at 2006-01-31 22:25
3 messages
2006/02/01
[#7274] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
3 messages
2006/02/01
[#7277] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
4 messages
2006/02/01
[#7280] Re: [PATCH] solaris 10 isinf and ruby_setenv fixes — ville.mattila@...
2 messages
2006/02/01
[#7286] Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273 — ara.t.howard@...
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Minero Aoki wrote:
23 messages
2006/02/02
[#7292] ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— mathew <meta@...>
2006/02/02
[#7293] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— mathew <meta@...>
2006/02/02
mathew wrote:
[#7298] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— James Britt <ruby@...>
2006/02/03
mathew wrote:
[#7310] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2006/02/07
I'm not sure we even need the 'with' syntax. Even if we do, it breaks
[#7311] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>
2006/02/07
On 2006.02.07 10:03, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7313] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2006/02/07
Umm, on what version are you seeing a warning there? I don't and never
[#7315] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>
2006/02/07
On 2006.02.07 14:47, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7316] Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— Evan Webb <evanwebb@...>
2006/02/07
I'd by far prefer it never emit a warning. The warning is assumes you
[#7318] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— ara.t.howard@...
2006/02/07
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Evan Webb wrote:
[#7321] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...>
2006/02/07
[#7322] Re: [RCR] ruby --quiet; was Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)
— ara.t.howard@...
2006/02/07
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:
[#7305] Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:33:40PM +0900, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
28 messages
2006/02/05
[#7401] Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2006/02/22
On Feb 5, 2006, at 5:05 AM, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7414] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
2006/02/23
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 02:21:24PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7427] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/02/26
Hi,
[#7429] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
2006/02/26
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:45:28AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7430] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
2006/02/26
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 06:06:17PM +0100, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7432] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/02/27
In article <20060226171117.GB29508@tux-chan>,
[#7428] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/02/26
In article <1140968746.321377.18843.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7444] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— nobu@...
2006/02/28
Hi,
[#7445] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/02/28
In article <m1FDshr-0006MNC@Knoppix>,
[#7447] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/02/28
In article <87irr047sx.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7448] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/02/28
In article <87vev0hxu5.fsf@m17n.org>,
[#7465] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— "Evan Webb" <evanwebb@...>
2006/03/01
Just my quick 2 cents...
[#7468] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/03/01
In article <92f5f81d0602281855g27e78f4eua8bf20e0b8e47b68@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7469] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— nobu@...
2006/03/01
Hi,
[#7471] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
2006/03/02
In article <m1FESAD-0001blC@Knoppix>,
[#7473] Re: Symbols overlap ordinary objects, especially on OS X (Was: Re: Problem with weak references on OS X 10.3)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/03/02
Hi,
[#7331] Set containing duplicates — noreply@...
Bugs item #3506, was opened at 2006-02-08 22:52
5 messages
2006/02/08
[#7337] Parse error within Regexp — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2006/02/11
[#7338] Re: Parse error within Regexp
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/02/11
Hi,
[#7340] Re: Parse error within Regexp
— Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
2006/02/11
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 01:34:55AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7344] Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel — Dae San Hwang <daesan@...>
Hi, all. This is my first time posting to this mailing list.
5 messages
2006/02/12
[#7348] Socket.getaddrinfo & Bonjour (Was: Re: Ruby 1.8.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 Intel)
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2006/02/13
On Feb 12, 2006, at 6:14 AM, Dae San Hwang wrote:
[#7347] Latest change to eval.c — Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>
It seems that the latest change to eval.c (1.616.2.154) has broken irb.
9 messages
2006/02/12
[#7349] Re: Latest change to eval.c
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/02/13
Hi,
[#7354] Re: Latest change to eval.c
— Kent Sibilev <ksruby@...>
2006/02/13
Thanks, Matz.
[#7364] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected) — noreply@...
Bugs item #3565, was opened at 2006-02-15 02:32
8 messages
2006/02/15
[#7365] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/02/15
Hi,
[#7371] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected)
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2006/02/15
[#7374] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected)
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2006/02/15
Hi,
[#7375] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-3565 ] Method object used as Object#instance_eval block doesn't work (as expected)
— Ozgur Murat Homurlu <ozgurmurath@...>
2006/02/15
On Pr 2006-02-16 at 03:18 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7376] Minor tracer.rb patch — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
6 messages
2006/02/15
[#7396] IO#reopen — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
5 messages
2006/02/20
[#7403] Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9 — Emiel van de Laar <emiel@...>
Hi List,
12 messages
2006/02/22
[#7404] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9
— George Ogata <g_ogata@...>
2006/02/22
Emiel van de Laar <emiel@rednode.nl> writes:
[#7406] Re: Module#define_method "send hack" fails with Ruby 1.9
— dblack@...
2006/02/22
Hi --
[#7439] FYI: ruby-lang.org is on spamcop blacklists — mathew <meta@...>
dnsbl/bl.spamcop.net returned deny: for
3 messages
2006/02/27
[#7442] GC Question — zdennis <zdennis@...>
I have been posting to the ruby-talk mailing list about ruby memory and GC, and I think it's ready
17 messages
2006/02/27
[#7446] Re: GC Question
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2006/02/28
Hello.
[#7449] Re: GC Question
— "H.Yamamoto" <ocean@...2.ccsnet.ne.jp>
2006/02/28
Hello.
[PATCH] Rubygems/ri integration
From:
Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date:
2006-02-24 22:47:53 UTC
List:
ruby-core #7423
I just added a patch to Rubygems that allows it to generate ri data for gems. In order to work correctly the gem ri documentation directories need to be added to ri's search path. The attached patch allows ri to look into Rubygems for ri data provided Rubygems is installed. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://segment7.net This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant http://trackmap.robotcoop.com
Attachments (1)
ri_path.rb.rubygems.patch
(607 Bytes, text/x-diff)
Index: lib/rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb
===================================================================
RCS file: /src/ruby/lib/rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -r1.5 ri_paths.rb
--- lib/rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb 20 Feb 2006 08:34:51 -0000 1.5
+++ lib/rdoc/ri/ri_paths.rb 24 Feb 2006 22:44:47 -0000
@@ -41,5 +41,11 @@
# This is the search path for 'ri'
PATH = [ SYSDIR, SITEDIR, HOMEDIR ].find_all {|p| p && File.directory?(p)}
+
+ begin
+ require 'rubygems'
+ Dir["#{Gem.path}/doc/*/ri"].each { |path| RI::Paths::PATH << path }
+ rescue LoadError
+ end
end
end