From: James Britt <ruby@...>
Date: 2006-02-04T00:36:21+09:00
Subject: Re: ANDCALL / iff? / &? (was Re: ruby-dev summary 28206-28273)

mathew wrote:
>...


> with a[1]
>  strip!
>  empty?
> end
> 
> or similar. Hopefully you get the basic idea anyway, and someone can 
> refine the semantics if they like it...


I'm not too keen on terse syntax; clarity for the read takes precedence 
over ease for the writer.  The 'with' syntax is more expressive.


James