[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56842] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8827] A method that flips the receiver and the first argument

From: "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
Date: 2013-08-28 04:35:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #56842
Issue #8827 has been updated by sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada).


nobu, I think you mean `tap{|ary| break ...}`, etc. That does not look concise enough for me. It might look like a small difference, but it makes huge difference when you are in the middle of a chain. It saves you from thinking extra things.
----------------------------------------
Feature #8827: A method that flips the receiver and the first argument
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8827#change-41384

Author: sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: 
Target version: 


=begin
If it often happens that we need to pass to a method an argument that is the result of a long chain of operations:

    Hash[some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_an_array]

    File.read(some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_a_string)

    YAML.dump(some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_an_object)

    ...

I believe one basic tenet of Ruby is to encourage method chaining, but that practice is discouraged in the examples above. It would be convenient if there is a method (let us call this `Object#flip`) that flips the receiver and the first argument and sends the method so that the examples above can be written as follows:

    some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_an_array.flip(Hash, :[])

    some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_a_string.flip(File, :read)

    some_chain_of_operations_that_ends_up_with_an_object.flip(YAML, :dump)

    ...

The implementation in Ruby may be as follows:

    class Object
      def flip receiver, method, *rest, &pr
        receiver.send(method, self, *rest, &pr)
      end
    end

It would be good if we can have that as a built-in Ruby method.

=end


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread