[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56451] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #8735][Open] Enumerator::Lazy#zip behaves differently from Enumerable#zip when yield with non-single argument

From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@...>
Date: 2013-08-08 07:42:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #56451
I believe the issue is here:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/enumerator.c#L1703

I'd write a patch for the cases argc==0{Qnil} or argc>1{rb_ary_new4(...)}
but I'm away from my computer right now.

Sent from my phone, so excuse the typos.
On Aug 5, 2013 9:30 PM, "kachick (Kenichi Kamiya)" <kachick1@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> Issue #8735 has been reported by kachick (Kenichi Kamiya).
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Bug #8735: Enumerator::Lazy#zip behaves differently from Enumerable#zip
> when yield with non-single argument
> https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8735
>
> Author: kachick (Kenichi Kamiya)
> Status: Open
> Priority: Normal
> Assignee:
> Category:
> Target version:
> ruby -v: ruby -v ruby 2.1.0dev (2013-08-05 trunk 42385) [i686-linux]
> Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN
>
>
> =begin
> Is this intended?
>
>
>  obj = Object.new
>  def obj.each
>    yield
>    yield 1, 2
>  end
>
>  obj.to_enum.zip(obj.to_enum)            #=> [[nil, nil],
>                                          #    [[1, 2], [1, 2]]]
>
>
>  obj.to_enum.lazy.zip(obj.to_enum).force #=> [[false, nil],
>                                          #    [1, [1, 2]]]
> =end
>
>
>
> --
> http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
>
>

In This Thread