[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56811] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8820][Open] Speed up Array#index

From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
Date: 2013-08-26 19:57:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #56811
"trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
>     def main
>       n = 10000000  # ten million
>       a = randPerm(100)
> 
>       t0 = Time.now
> 
>       n.times do |i|
>         a.index(i)
>       end
> 
>       puts "%.5f" % [Time.now - t0]
>     end
> 
>     def randPerm(n)
>       (0...n).sort_by{rand}
>     end

The performance of your code varies between runs because the
ordering is always different and index is O(n) _worst_ case.
call srand(0) before any rand calls to get a consistent seed.

I suspect your Go code has the same flaw (but I don't know Go)

> The result
> 
>   Ruby: 71.08961 secs
>     Go: 2.61975 secs
> 
> That's pretty huge difference (and worse I was told my Go index
> function was "crazily inefficient" too, though personally I don't see
> how it can be any better). So, I thought I'd mention it. Maybe it
> would be possible to speed up

From what I can tell, rb_ary_index in array.c doesn't use the optimized
== definition in insns.def (which inlines some common comparisions) to
avoid rb_funcall overhead.

Maybe that can help this case...

Otoh, I would never use anything like Array#index on large arrays and/or
hot code in the first place.  After all these years of Ruby, I've hardly
ever used Array#index.  The only time in recent memory I used it was on
a 5-element array of short strings.

In This Thread