[#56329] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8722][Assigned] Refinements remain active beyond the end of an evaled string — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

9 messages 2013/08/02

[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread"

From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
Date: 2013-08-27 11:13:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #56824
Issue #8823 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

----------------------------------------
Feature #8823: Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread"
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8823

Author: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: core
Target version: current: 2.1.0


= Abstract

How about to make an "Signal thread" to run trap handler?

= Problem

Now, all of thread synchronization methods are not permitted because there is a possibility of deadlock between trap handler and main thraed.

For example:

  m = Mutex.new
  trap(:INT){
    m.synchronization{...}
  }
  m.synchronization{
    ...
    ... # recv SIGINT, and invoke trap handler
    ...
  }

In this case, trap handler (a block passed to trap method) is run on the main thread.

= Proposal

Make a signal handler independent from main thread. If main thread and trap handler run in different threads, there are no such problem.

= Implementation

Don't create signal handler at first. But the first time we need a signal handler, signal handler is created by main thread.

See timing chart (PDF) I attached.

= Discussion

== Advantage:
* Signal thread is independent on main thread, this means that you can use thread synchronization between trap handler and main thread. In other words, you can run any program in trap handler.
* Simplify a path from sighandler to trap invocation thread (after creation of a signal thread)
* Doesn’t need a difficult implementation (modify is limited).

== Disadvantage:
* There is a small compatibility issue because “Thread.current” on a trap handler is not a main thread.

== Other Discussion:
* Create signal thread at first like timer thread is high cost. Without `trap’, we don’t need a signal thread any more.
* In signal handler and timer thread, we can’t make a signal thread because creating “Ruby thread” (== signal thread) needs GVL. So the process path from timer thread to main thread is remained.

== Other thought

I know a philosophy that `trap' should run only a tiny program, without synchronization and so on. I agree with this philosophy. Current behaveour which prohibits synchronization features helps this philosophy. But I'm not sure which is good way for Ruby.




-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next