From: duerst@...
Date: 2014-10-27T09:35:10+00:00
Subject: [ruby-core:65924] [CommonRuby - Feature #8848] Syntax for binary	strings

Issue #8848 has been updated by Martin D��rst.

Related to Feature #10391: Provide %eISO-8859-1'string \xAA literal' string literals with explicit encoding added

----------------------------------------
Feature #8848: Syntax for binary strings
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8848#change-49661

* Author: Martin D��rst
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: 
* Category: 
* Target version: 
----------------------------------------
In commit 37486, Yui (Naruse) added a String#b method as proposed in http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6767.

String#b was added to allow easy generation of binary strings; this became necessary in particular after the source file encoding was changed to UTF-8.

However, as also recognized in http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6767, in the long term (ideally starting with Ruby 2.1) it would be better to make binary strings available as part of Ruby syntax.

One reason for this efficiency. String#b creates a duplicate object, which is not at all necessary for the frequent use case of String literals.

Another reason is encoding validity. To be able to e.g. create a "\xFF" binary string, with String#b in an UTF-8 source context, it is necessary to allow "\xFF" (temporarily at least) as an (actually invalid) UTF-8 string. This may be difficult for some implementations, and isn't desirable in general.

Regarding syntax, there are mainly two solutions:

1) a '%b' prefix
2) a 'b' suffix

The preferable syntax depends on the overall future approach of Ruby to String literal suffixes (see https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8579).



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/