[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56830] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8815] Enumerable.drop_while returns an Enumerator. Calling next twice on the Enumerator raises StopIteration even if there are still items available

From: "JEG2 (James Gray)" <jeg2@...>
Date: 2013-08-27 16:11:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #56830
Issue #8815 has been updated by JEG2 (James Gray).


Isn't that backwards?

    >> [1, 2, 3].drop_while { nil }
    => [1, 2, 3]
    >> [1, 2, 3].drop_while { false }
    => [1, 2, 3]
    >> [1, 2, 3].drop_while { true }
    => []

----------------------------------------
Bug #8815: Enumerable.drop_while returns an Enumerator. Calling next twice on the Enumerator raises StopIteration even if there are still items available 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8815#change-41377

Author: ebouchut (Eric Bouchut)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee: 
Category: core
Target version: 
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0p247 (2013-06-27 revision 41674) [x86_64-darwin12.3.0]
Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN


I have an enumerable (array) that contains 3 items 
  [1, 2, 3].
I send drop_while without a block to this array to get an Enumerator.
  enumerator = [1, 2, 3].drop_while

When I call next twice on the Enumerator
  enumerator.next  # => 1
  enumerator.next  # => raises StopIteration
The second call enumerator.next raises StopIteration whereas the Enumerable contains more than one item.

I expected the second call to enumerator.next to return 2 instead.


I reproduced this on:
 - ruby-1.9.3-p448
 - ruby-2.0.0-p247
 - rbx-2.0.0
However it works fine in 1.8.7, even if 1.8.7's documentation did not mention about Enumerable.drop_while returning an Enumerator.

Here is an RSpec example that isolates the problem:
  http://preview.tinyurl.com/enumerable-drop-while



Eric


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next