[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56471] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8761][Open] Binding#local_variable_get, set, defined?

From: "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
Date: 2013-08-09 09:52:53 UTC
List: ruby-core #56471
Issue #8761 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).

----------------------------------------
Feature #8761: Binding#local_variable_get, set, defined?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8761

Author: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Status: Open
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: 
Target version: 


I propose new 3 methods of Binding.

- Binding#local_variable_get(sym)
- Binding#local_variable_set(sym)
- Binding#local_variable_defined?(sym)

Maybe you can imagine the behavior.

These methods help the following cases:

(1) Access to special keyword arguments

From Ruby 2.0, we can use keyword arguments. And further more, you can use special keyword named such as `if', `begin' and `end', the language keyword.

However, of course you can't access the local variable `if', because of syntax error.

For example,

  def access begin: 0, end: 100
    p(begin) #=> syntax error
    p(end)   #=> syntax error
  end

To access such a special keyword parameter, you can use Binding#local_variable_get(sym)

  def access begin: 0, end: 100
    p(binding.local_variable_get(:begin)) #=> syntax error
    p(binding.local_variable_get(:end))   #=> syntax error
  end

(2) Create a binding with specific local variables

If you wan to make a binding which contains several local variables, you can use Binding#local_variable_set to do it.
(See [Feature #8643])


----

Implementation note:
I think Binding is good place to put these methods than Kernel.
Using binding make it clear that it is need to access to a local environment.
It will help optimization (don't interrupt optimization).

----

You can try these methods on ruby 2.1dev (trunk), committed at r42464.
Your comments are welcome.

This proposal was discussed at dev-meeting at Japan 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/projects/ruby/wiki/DevelopersMeeting20130727Japan
and Matz accepted it.



-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

In This Thread

Prev Next