From: "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" Date: 2013-08-03T15:40:37+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:56346] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. Issue #8723 has been updated by nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU). I find I need to address all the questions ============= "If enum is empty, there is in fact *none* element which could not satisfy the predicate. " -- Eregon none element which could not satisfy, you could interpret this as "all elements satisfy" however I think this is wrong because there are no elements to satisfy, which means the result is undefined (maybe you could say nil), not true. ============= "So what's the neutral element of logical or (���)? It's false. And what's the neutral element of logical and (���)? It's true. That means that we get false for [].any {|x| predicate(x) }, and true for [].all {|x| predicate(x) }. " -- duerst I see completely what you are getting at and it does make sense only if the result is either true or false. (which is what predicate is defined as, mathematically, loosely speaking) However I find the result needs not be defined. Also, defining "all?" or "any?" makes no sense for empty set since they will never execute. Programmatically speaking, one could treat, based on this opinion, the result of all and any as any false'ey value such as nil or false. ============ Of course I understand that there are other languages which do this the same, I also understand that it would break existing code, and I know that docs are clear, and of course I can write my own, but is it really correct behavior to treat undefinedness as truth? In my opinion, no. ---------------------------------------- Feature #8723: Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8723#change-40841 Author: nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU) Status: Rejected Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: Are all your children redheaded? Would this be true if you have no children? I have no children, therefore none of my children are redheaded. Therefore [].any?{ true } == true makes no sense. Expected behavior: [].any?{ true } == false because the array is empty. -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/