[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>
[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>
2013/8/28 nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada) <nobu@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56389] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8738][Open] Integer#single_bit? (Actually Fixnum#single_bit? and Bignum#single_bit?) — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#56517] Re: [ruby-cvs:49638] zzak:r42496 (trunk): * lib/time.rb: [DOC] Document constants by @markijbema [Fixes GH-377] — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/8/11 <zzak@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56523] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8769][Open] [PATCH] process.c (rb_fork_internal): remove cloexec setting — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>
[#56551] [CommonRuby - Feature #8777][Open] Process.mach_absolute_time — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <tenderlove@...>
[#56567] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8780][Assigned] DBM#to_h alias for #to_hash — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <e@...>
[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 07:17:50AM +0900, trans (Thomas Sawyer) wrote:
(13/08/17 13:13), Aaron Patterson wrote:
(2013/08/12 15:35), ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
(2013/08/16 14:21), Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
Em 16-08-2013 03:24, Aaron Patterson escreveu:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 09:35:04AM -0300, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>
(2013/08/16 10:47), normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Hi
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com> wrote:
[#56658] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8796][Open] Use GMP to accelerate Bignum operations — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56672] Re: [ruby-cvs:49733] eregon:r42591 (trunk): * process.c (rb_clock_gettime): document CLOCK_REALTIME and — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2013/8/17 <eregon@ruby-lang.org>:
On 17 August 2013 02:52, Tanaka Akira <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
[#56746] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8803][Open] Another buffer overflow — "user021 (a s)" <user021@...>
[#56753] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8804][Open] ONCE syntax — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#56762] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8805][Open] Ruby GC::Profiler returns incorrect info on Solaris (and relatives) — "sax (Eric Saxby)" <sax@...>
[#56780] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8809][Open] Process.clock_getres — "akr (Akira Tanaka)" <akr@...>
[#56795] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8816][Open] Tempfile.new may return the same name for parallel calls — "375gnu (Hleb Valoshka)" <redmine@...>
[#56809] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8820][Open] Speed up Array#index — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>
"trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
2013/8/27 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[#56839] [ANN] Ruby Developer Meeting 20130831 — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Hi,
Hi,
[#56861] [ruby-trunk - Feature #3620] Add Queue, SIzedQueue and ConditionVariable implementations in C in addition to ruby ones — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
"ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#56866] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8834][Open] Kernel#load_relative — "sawa (Tsuyoshi Sawada)" <sawadatsuyoshi@...>
[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#56911] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8846][Open] Publicize Module#include — "matsuda (Akira Matsuda)" <ronnie@...>
[ruby-core:56346] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array.
Issue #8723 has been updated by nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU).
I find I need to address all the questions
=============
"If enum is empty, there is in fact *none* element which could not satisfy the predicate. " -- Eregon
none element which could not satisfy, you could interpret this as "all elements satisfy" however I think this is wrong because there are no elements to satisfy, which means the result is undefined (maybe you could say nil), not true.
=============
"So what's the neutral element of logical or (∨)? It's false. And what's the neutral element of logical and (∧)? It's true. That means that we get false for [].any {|x| predicate(x) }, and true for [].all {|x| predicate(x) }. " -- duerst
I see completely what you are getting at and it does make sense only if the result is either true or false. (which is what predicate is defined as, mathematically, loosely speaking) However I find the result needs not be defined. Also, defining "all?" or "any?" makes no sense for empty set since they will never execute. Programmatically speaking, one could treat, based on this opinion, the result of all and any as any false'ey value such as nil or false.
============
Of course I understand that there are other languages which do this the same, I also understand that it would break existing code, and I know that docs are clear, and of course I can write my own, but is it really correct behavior to treat undefinedness as truth? In my opinion, no.
----------------------------------------
Feature #8723: Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8723#change-40841
Author: nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)
Status: Rejected
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category:
Target version:
Are all your children redheaded?
Would this be true if you have no children?
I have no children, therefore none of my children are redheaded.
Therefore
[].any?{ true } == true makes no sense.
Expected behavior:
[].any?{ true } == false because the array is empty.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/