[#56329] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8722][Assigned] Refinements remain active beyond the end of an evaled string — "charliesome (Charlie Somerville)" <charliesome@...>

9 messages 2013/08/02

[#56333] [CommonRuby - Feature #8723][Open] Array.any? predicate returns true for empty array. — "nurettin (Nurettin Onur TUGCU)" <onurtugcu@...>

12 messages 2013/08/02

[#56368] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8730][Open] "rescue Exception" rescues Timeout::ExitException — "takiuchi (Genki Takiuchi)" <genki@...21g.com>

15 messages 2013/08/04

[#56407] [ruby-trunk - misc #8741][Open] email notification on bugs.ruby-lang.org is broken — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>

18 messages 2013/08/05

[#56524] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8770][Open] [PATCH] process.c: avoid EINTR from Process.spawn — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

19 messages 2013/08/10

[#56536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8772][Open] Hash alias #| merge, and the case for Hash and Array polymorphism — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <redmine@...>

24 messages 2013/08/11

[#56544] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8774][Open] rb_file_dirname return wrong encoding string when dir is "." — jiayp@... (贾 延平) <jiayp@...>

10 messages 2013/08/11

[#56569] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781][Open] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

31 messages 2013/08/12
[#56582] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — "drbrain (Eric Hodel)" <drbrain@...7.net> 2013/08/12

[#56584] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...> 2013/08/12

(2013/08/13 2:25), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:

[#56636] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8781] Use require_relative() instead of require() if possible — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...> 2013/08/16

On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 07:38:01AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:

[#56634] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8788][Open] use eventfd on newer Linux instead of pipe for timer thread — "normalperson (Eric Wong)" <normalperson@...>

11 messages 2013/08/16

[#56648] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8795][Open] "Null byte in string error" on Marshal.load — "mml (McClain Looney)" <m@...>

17 messages 2013/08/16

[#56824] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8823][Open] Run trap handler in an independent thread called "Signal thread" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>

14 messages 2013/08/27

[#56878] [ruby-trunk - misc #8835][Open] Introducing a semantic versioning scheme and branching policy — "knu (Akinori MUSHA)" <knu@...>

11 messages 2013/08/30

[#56890] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8839][Open] Class and module should return the class or module that was opened — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>

26 messages 2013/08/30

[#56894] [ruby-trunk - Feature #8840][Open] Yielder#state — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>

14 messages 2013/08/30

[ruby-core:56781] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #8809][Open] Process.clock_getres

From: David MacMahon <davidm@...>
Date: 2013-08-22 16:10:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #56781
On Aug 22, 2013, at 7:33 AM, akr (Akira Tanaka) wrote:

> I made a pacth to invoke clock_getres function.

Thanks for making a patch!  It makes the discussion much less abstract =
(more real?).  I think I will try to follow your example in the future.

>=20
>  Process.clock_getres(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC) #=3D> 1.0e-09
>  Process.clock_getres(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE) #=3D> =
0.00400025
>=20
> The result means that the resolution of CLOCK_MONOTONIC is 1ns and
> the resolution of CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE is 4.00025ms.

Did you consider having these methods return Rational rather than Float?

>=20
> Process.clock_getres has optional unit argument as =
Process.clock_gettime.
>=20
>  Process.clock_getres(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC, :nanosecond) #=3D> 1
>  Process.clock_getres(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE, :nanosecond) =
#=3D> 4000250
>=20
> It supports emulated clocks as well.
>=20
>  Process.clock_getres(:SUS_GETTIMEOFDAY_BASED_CLOCK_REALTIME) #=3D> =
1.0000000000000002e-06
>  Process.clock_getres(:SUS_GETRUSAGE_BASED_CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID) =
#=3D> 1.0000000000000002e-06
>=20
> The unit argument can be :hertz, which means the reciprocal of the =
second.
>=20
>  Process.clock_getres(:SUS_GETRUSAGE_BASED_CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, =
:hertz) #=3D> 1000000.0

How would you feel about supporting :ns and :hz as equivalents for =
:nanosecond and :hertz?

> Note that
> Process.clock_getres(:POSIX_TIMES_BASED_CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, =
:hertz) is the clock ticks per second (CLK_TCK) and
> Process.clock_getres(:ISO_C_CLOCK_BASED_CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, =
:hertz) is CLOCK_PER_SEC.
> I wanted to access them easily to investigate emulated clock behaviors =
on
> various OSes.

Those are some long symbols!  Are these intended only for =
experimental/investigative use?

> Any comments?

I appreciate having access to POSIX functionality, so I'm all for this =
idea!

Thanks,
Dave

In This Thread