[#3479] Missing .document files for ext/ libraries — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

The ri documentation for zlib, strscan and iconv doesn't get built by 'make

12 messages 2004/10/06

[#3492] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...>

> In message "Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch"

15 messages 2004/10/11
[#3493] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/11

Hi,

[#3495] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/12

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 16:16, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3561] 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

23 messages 2004/10/26
[#3562] Re: 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/27

Hi,

Re: Float and Bignum

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-28 06:00:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #3598
Hi,

In message "Re: Float and Bignum"
    on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:42:15 +0900, "trans.  (T. Onoma)" <transami@runbox.com> writes:

|What does Ruby currently use for FP and Bignum? I've been reading a little on 
|GMP and addons to it. Pretty impressive stuff. So I was wondering.

Ruby uses its own implementation of Bignum.  I'm not sure what FP
stands for.  Some suggest me to use better algorithm, or better
implementation such as GMP.  But I couldn't use GMP for its licensing
issues.  If some one comes up with his better Bignum implementation
patch, I'd be happy to apply it.


							matz.

In This Thread