Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch

Hi,

In message "Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch"
    on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:09:22 +0900, Markus <[e-mail]> writes:

|     I have no real preference between them; unlike the issue Proc.new()
|automatically exploding single array argument (which would break a fair
|amount of production code for me) this experimental patch is something I
|started on because others seemed to be wanting it (or at least, wanting
|things that it could give them).  Do you wish me to continue with it? 
|Take it in some other direction?  Drop it?

Since you don't "force" me to merge it, I leave it for you.  If you
want to continue, you can.  If you don't want to without my promise,
don't.

|     My goal here is to try to pay back some of what I owe ruby, so your
|advise would be welcome.

I'm not positive for adding it (in near future), mostly due to fear of
possible obfuscation, but this discussion as a whole is worthy, I
think.  Besides that, I believe you've learned a lot about the parser.
It's good for me to have people who knows Ruby parser, and are willing
to advice me, like yourself.

							matz.