[#3479] Missing .document files for ext/ libraries — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

The ri documentation for zlib, strscan and iconv doesn't get built by 'make

12 messages 2004/10/06

[#3492] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...>

> In message "Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch"

15 messages 2004/10/11
[#3493] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/11

Hi,

[#3495] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/12

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 16:16, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3561] 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

23 messages 2004/10/26
[#3562] Re: 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/27

Hi,

Re: Kernighan & Richie ---> prototypes ?

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2004-10-13 17:43:50 UTC
List: ruby-core #3518
Hi,

In message "Re: Kernighan & Richie ---> prototypes ?"
    on Thu, 14 Oct 2004 02:37:23 +0900, Johan Holmberg <holmberg@iar.se> writes:

|That must mean that the old-style is just a "rest of the past",
|and Ruby will not compile with a pre-prototype compiler any more.
|Correct ?

Correct.

|  What is holding back a conversion of the K&R code
|  to use prototypes ?

My preference.  I like prototypes.  But I dislike the new style
argument list, especially when the list becomes large with type
names.

							matz.

In This Thread