[#3479] Missing .document files for ext/ libraries — Brian Candler <B.Candler@...>

The ri documentation for zlib, strscan and iconv doesn't get built by 'make

12 messages 2004/10/06

[#3492] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...>

> In message "Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch"

15 messages 2004/10/11
[#3493] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/11

Hi,

[#3495] Re: ANN: Free-form-operators patch — Markus <markus@...> 2004/10/12

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 16:16, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#3561] 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Dave Thomas <dave@...>

Folks:

23 messages 2004/10/26
[#3562] Re: 1.8.2 - what can we do to help? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2004/10/27

Hi,

Re: 1.8.2 - what can we do to help?

From: "trans. (T. Onoma)" <transami@...>
Date: 2004-10-27 13:05:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #3567
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 08:51 am, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
| Hi,
|
| In message "Re: 1.8.2 - what can we do to help?"
|
|     on Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:59:13 +0900, Hugh Sasse Staff Elec Eng 
<hgs@dmu.ac.uk> writes:
| |RubyForge has some bug/issue tracking facilities which might be less
| |cluttered than a Wiki tends to get.  You wouldn't need to release
| |files via rubyforge to have a management project, AFAIK.  I'm thinking it
| |needs to be easy to find if an issue is listed, if it is fixed, etc,
| |to help people who want to contribute.
|
| I'm just too lazy to set up and try.  If some one help me, RubyForge
| bug tracking is OK for me.
|
|        matz.

So there will be new mailing list? ruby-bug? And ruby-core twill be for what?

T.

In This Thread