[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42

14 messages 2007/05/02
[#11142] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/10

Hi,

[#11188] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/05/16

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi all.

17 messages 2007/05/25

Re: BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0

From: Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
Date: 2007-05-31 02:59:12 UTC
List: ruby-core #11370
Hi,

At Thu, 31 May 2007 07:28:59 +0900,
David Flanagan wrote in [ruby-core:11367]:
> A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6, 
> but it does in both 1.8.4 and today's 1.9.0 build.

The latest 1.8.6 in SVN returns the same result.

-- 
Nobu Nakada

In This Thread