[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
14 messages
2007/05/02
[#11142] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/10
Hi,
[#11188] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2007/05/16
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11189] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/17
Hi,
[#11192] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/17
Hi,
[#11195] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2007/05/17
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
[#11196] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2007/05/17
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
[#11197] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/17
Hi,
[#11199] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2007/05/17
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
[#11202] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/18
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
9 messages
2007/05/03
[#11083] Re: Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks.
— George <george.ogata@...>
2007/05/04
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
[#11084] Re: Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks.
— Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
2007/05/04
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
[#11086] Re: Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks.
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2007/05/04
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2007/05/07
[#11109] Re: pattern for implementation-private constants?
— "Nathan Weizenbaum" <nex342@...>
2007/05/08
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
6 messages
2007/05/09
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
4 messages
2007/05/10
[#11149] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10739 ] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1
— Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
2007/05/10
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
5 messages
2007/05/15
[#11173] Re: [Minor Change Proposal] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again
— =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
2007/05/15
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
7 messages
2007/05/16
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
4 messages
2007/05/20
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
17 messages
2007/05/25
[#11235] Re: Planning to release 1.8.6 errata
— Calamitas <calamitates@...>
2007/05/25
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
6 messages
2007/05/26
[#11253] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-11134 ] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?)
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2007/05/26
Hi,
[#11264] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-11134 ] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinitstack(threads problem?)
— gga <ggarra@...>
2007/05/27
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
4 messages
2007/05/26
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
7 messages
2007/05/27
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
4 messages
2007/05/30
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
9 messages
2007/05/31
[#11372] Re: $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC
— "sur max" <sur.max@...>
2007/05/31
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Bugs-10588 ] parsedate fails
From:
<noreply@...>
Date:
2007-05-04 17:51:57 UTC
List:
ruby-core #11090
Bugs item #10588, was opened at 2007-05-04 12:51
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=10588&group_id=426
Category: None
Group: 1.8.6
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Michael Dotterer (mdotterer)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: parsedate fails
Initial Comment:
On Windows XP with Ruby 1.8.6 and Rails 1.2.3
Using String#to_date (which calls parsedate) raises the message "can't modify frozen string"
Trace:
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/date/format.rb:105:in `chomp!'
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/date/format.rb:105:in `method_missing'
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/date/format.rb:963:in `_parse'
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/1.8/parsedate.rb:47:in `parsedate'
#{RAILS_ROOT}/vendor/rails/activesupport/lib/active_support/core_ext/string/conversions.rb:14:in `to_date'
...
I was unable to reproduce the error using irb.
The problem does not occur with 1.8.5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=10588&group_id=426