[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Bugs-10713 ] Weird rounding behavior..
Bugs item #10713, was opened at 2007-05-09 11:12 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=10713&group_id=426 Category: None Group: None Status: Closed Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: john oordopjes (oordopjes) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Weird rounding behavior.. Initial Comment: irb(main):002:0> n=4 => 4 irb(main):003:0> a=(52.07825 * (10.0 ** n)) => 520782.5 irb(main):004:0> a.round => 520782 Which is WRONG it should be 520783. Using an other number: irb(main):005:0> a=(52.07835 * (10.0 ** n)) => 520783.5 irb(main):006:0> a.round => 520784 This is correct behavior.. really WEIRD isn't it? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Roel Harbers (rharbers) Date: 2007-05-10 08:17 Message: To expand on Nobuyoshi's answer, it's not a bug, it's called banker's rounding. When encountering a .5 value, round towards the nearest even number. This is to prevent rounding bias, and is a common way to round in most languages I know. Additionally, rounding of floating point values can look deceiving, because what looks like 7.5 might actually be 7.499999, so it should be rounded towards 7. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rounding for more information. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobuyoshi Nakada (nobu) Date: 2007-05-10 02:10 Message: Not a bug. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=10713&group_id=426