[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42

14 messages 2007/05/02
[#11142] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/10

Hi,

[#11188] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/05/16

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi all.

17 messages 2007/05/25

[ ruby-Bugs-8971 ] [PATCH/Cygwin] Build shared libs with --enable-auto-image-base

From: <noreply@...>
Date: 2007-05-29 15:59:56 UTC
List: ruby-core #11296
Bugs item #8971, was opened at 2007-03-01 03:32
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=8971&group_id=426

>Category: Triage (do not select)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Corinna Vinschen (corinna)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: [PATCH/Cygwin] Build shared libs with --enable-auto-image-base

Initial Comment:
Hi,

in the Cygwin net distribution I started to build the ruby package
with the additional -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base flag in the DLDFLAGS
Makefile variable.  The idea is to avoid the neccessity to rebase the
shared libs as much as possible.  I'm wondering if you'd like to apply
the attached patch to the ruby configure.in file, which accomplishes this
behaviour.

Btw., what I don't quite understand is this:  What is the cygwin
subdirectory with the GNUMakefile.in for?  It uses old and deprecated
methods like using dllwrap to create shared libs on Cygwin.  However, I
never used it to build the Cygwin net distro ruby package, which always
worked fine.  So I'm wondering if the cygwin subdir and the funny
GNUMakefile.in could just be removed.


Thanks,
Corinna

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=8971&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next