[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Bugs-9053 ] YAML.load(file) cannot be used to load documents in sequence.
Bugs item #9053, was opened at 2007-03-05 07:49
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9053&group_id=426
>Category: DB / File Formats
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Rick DeNatale (rdenatale)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: YAML.load(file) cannot be used to load documents in sequence.
Initial Comment:
YAML.load(file) should load the next document in a file containing yaml, and leave the file positioned so that the next document can be loaded.
This does not appear to be the case. For this ruby program
rick@frodo:/public/rubyscripts$ cat multiyaml.rb
require 'yaml'
File.open('testyaml','w') do |f|
YAML.dump("string1", f)
YAML.dump("string2", f)
end
File.open("testyaml") do |f|
p YAML.load(f)
p YAML.load(f)
end
File.open("testyaml") do |f|
YAML.each_document(f) {|obj| p obj}
end
I get the following results:
rick@frodo:/public/rubyscripts$ ruby1.8.6 -v
ruby 1.8.6 (2007-03-05 patchlevel 5000) [i686-linux]
rick@frodo:/public/rubyscripts$ ruby1.8.6 multiyaml.rb
"string1"
false
"string1"
"string2"
Note that YAML.each_document(f) properly processes the two yaml documents. The issue is that it should be possible to load them one at a time in sequence.
The same results obtain from 1.8.4 and 1.9
rick@frodo:/public/rubyscripts$ ruby1.8 -v
ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [i486-linux]
rick@frodo:/public/rubyscripts$ ruby1.9 -v
ruby 1.9.0 (2007-03-01 patchlevel 0) [i686-linux]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9053&group_id=426