[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> Thank you, does this patch fix it?
After a little more experiment, it does seem to fix the reported
problem, but now valgrind is giving me this when I call disasm:
==10863== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==10863== at 0x808CC1C: rb_id2str (parse.y:8484)
==10863== by 0x808CCF7: rb_id2name (parse.y:8508)
==10863== by 0x80D9C7D: ruby_iseq_disasm (iseq.c:762)
==10863== by 0x80E29E5: call_cfunc (call_cfunc.ci:27)
==10863== by 0x80DF937: th_eval (insns.def:1279)
==10863== by 0x80E1E35: th_eval_body (vm.c:1620)
==10863== by 0x80E25C9: rb_thread_eval (vm.c:1826)
==10863== by 0x80E4861: yarvcore_eval_iseq (yarvcore.c:97)
==10863== by 0x80E4931: yarvcore_eval_parsed (yarvcore.c:129)
==10863== by 0x805968D: ruby_exec_internal (eval.c:210)
==10863== by 0x80596C4: ruby_exec (eval.c:223)
==10863== by 0x80596FE: ruby_run (eval.c:242)
for this program:
is = VM::InstructionSequence.compile('1 + 1')
puts is.disasm
a = is.to_a
is2 = VM::InstructionSequence.load(a)
puts is2.disasm
and the output from the two disasm statements don't match:
== disasm: <ISeq:<main>@<compiled>>=====================================
0000 trace 1 ( 1)
0002 putobject 1
0004 putobject 1
0006 opt_plus
0007 leave
== disasm: <ISeq:<main>@<compiled>>=====================================
local table (size: 1, argc: 0 [opts: 0, rest: -1, block: -1] c)
[ 1] ?
0000 trace 1
0002 putobject 1
0004 putobject 1
0006 opt_plus
0007 leave
is this a problem?
I'm using this suppressions file for valgrind:
http://rubystuff.org/ruby.supp
Paul