[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
ri HTML output bug with constants
`ri -f HTML` doesn't render the constant section correctly (see the
output for String, for example). DefaultDisplay#display_class_info
passes the name of the constant as the prefix argument to
TextFormatter#wrap, and HTMLFormatter ignores the prefix argument.
This seems to be true for both 1.8.6 and trunk.
One way to address the problem is the strawman patch below; this
places the constants in a table. For plain text output, there is an
extra line between items. That could be fixed, at the risk of mangling
content which expects extra lines there. And it's perhaps not a great
idea to reference SM::Flow from ri_display.
--- /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_display.pristine.rb 2007-05-18
23:20:41.000000000 -0400
+++ /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_display.rb 2007-05-18
23:19:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -105,13 +110,18 @@
unless klass.constants.empty?
@formatter.blankline
@formatter.display_heading("Constants:", 2, "")
- len = 0
- klass.constants.each { |c| len = c.name.length if
c.name.length > len }
- len += 2
+
+ list = SM::Flow::LIST.new(SM::ListBase::NOTE)
+
klass.constants.each do |c|
- @formatter.wrap(c.value,
- @formatter.indent+((c.name+":").ljust(len)))
+ item = SM::Flow::LI.new
+ item.label = c.name
+ item.body = c.value
+ list << item
end
+
+ @formatter.display_list(list)
end
unless klass.class_methods.empty?