[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42

14 messages 2007/05/02
[#11142] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2007/05/10

Hi,

[#11188] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-10527 ] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2007/05/16

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>

Hi all.

17 messages 2007/05/25

How to handle Change Proposals that affect mainly Oniguruma (for Ruby)?

From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Date: 2007-05-20 14:33:01 UTC
List: ruby-core #11208
Hi!

I have an organizational question. I'm preparing currently a RCR and a 
corresponding text for this board. The RCR will, from a technical point 
of view, mainly affect Oniguruma. This means, that coding is necessary 
in the Oniguruma sources, but only some lines or nothing in the rest of 
the Ruby sources.

Accompanying I will change the Oniguruma code to implement a first trial 
version for the RCR.

Oniguruma is a Product of its own which is developed by K. Kosako 
completely independently of Ruby, provided that I have understood it 
correctly.

This is visible in Ruby sources too. The Ruby 1.9 snapshot from 
2007/05/15 contains Oniguruma 4.4.5, while the current version of 
Oniguruma itself is 4.6.2 (for the Oniguruma 4.x.y variant).

Now my questions.

1) In this case is it the right way to write a RCR or should I proceed 
differently?

2) Based on which Oniguruma version I should work on the test version?

I really don't know how to start in this case.

Wolfgang N疆asi-Donner



In This Thread

Prev Next