[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Patches-8127 ] ftp.rb raises an error that is not an FTPError on certain error conditions
Patches item #8127, was opened at 2007-01-24 18:05
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=8127&group_id=426
>Category: Network / Comm / Protocols
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Daniel Martin (fizbin)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: ftp.rb raises an error that is not an FTPError on certain error conditions
Initial Comment:
For more context, see ruby-talk:235896
If the server that ftp.rb is talking to unexpectedly closes the control connection in between responses, ftp.rb ends up raising an EOFError. This is highly confusing to the user, since any other server error generally causes an FTPError (or one of its subclasses).
Specifically, if an ftp server is overloaded with open connections such that subsequent connection requests have it accept the connection but immediately close it (this happens easily with inetd-based servers), then FTP.open will raise EOFError.
This is very confusing, and I think it a bug.
Therefore, the definition of getline in ftp.rb should be:
def getline
begin
line = @sock.readline # if get EOF, raise EOFError
rescue EOFError
raise FTPProtoError, "Connection closed unexpectedly"
end
line.sub!(/(\r\n|\n|\r)\z/n, "")
if @debug_mode
print "get: ", sanitize(line), "\n"
end
return line
end
private :getline
Instead of what it is now.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1700&aid=8127&group_id=426