[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Bugs-9208 ] Ruby Gem installer not playing nice on Ubuntu
Bugs item #9208, was opened at 2007-03-13 01:19 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9208&group_id=426 Category: None Group: None >Status: Deleted Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Ryan Prior (piratehead) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: Ruby Gem installer not playing nice on Ubuntu Initial Comment: I was running through the installation procedure suggested on this page: http://claudio.cicali.org/article/74/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-on-ubuntu-510 Gem broke when I ran "sudo gem update --system", and would not perform the next step in the list, "sudo gem install rails -y". I googled the error it gave and found this page: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/rubygems-developers/2007-January/002529.html Deleting /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/source_cache temporarily fixed the gem program, but if I ran "sudo gem update --system" again the source_cache file was restored and gave the same error. Running "sudo gem install rails -y" without running "sudo gem update --system" first did not give any good results. I'm not sure that this is a Ruby bug, but it seems to me that this may have broken recently because the comments at the bottom of the tutorial suggest that it has worked for many people. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Yukihiro Matsumoto (matz) Date: 2007-05-10 11:57 Message: It's not a bug for us. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Ryan Prior (piratehead) Date: 2007-03-13 05:12 Message: I submitted this bug to the RubyGems bug tracker. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Austin Ziegler (austin) Date: 2007-03-13 01:22 Message: This is definitely not a Ruby issue. This is a RubyGems issue and should be reported on that tracker, not on the general Ruby tracker. Since you seem to have a reproducible case, I know that the RubyGems folks would be highly interested in speaking with you about this. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=9208&group_id=426