[#11073] segfault printing instruction sequence for iterator — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10527, was opened at 2007-05-02 14:42
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 04:51:18PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This seems to make valgrind much happier.
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:14:35PM +0900, Paul Brannan wrote:
Hi,
Now 'a' shows up twice in the local table:
Hi,
[#11082] Understanding code: Kernel#require and blocks. — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
I'm trying to debug a Rails application which complains about an
On 5/4/07, Hugh Sasse <hgs@dmu.ac.uk> wrote:
On Fri, 4 May 2007, George wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 06:18:19PM +0900, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#11108] pattern for implementation-private constants? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Hi,
I believe there isn't a way, but I don't think it's really necessary. Just
[#11127] Bugs that can be closed — "Jano Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>
I propose closing these bugs as invalid:
[#11145] Rational comparison to 0 fails when denominator is != 1 — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #10739, was opened at 2007-05-10 22:06
Hi,
[#11169] Allow back reference with nest level in Oniguruma for Ruby again — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Wolfgang_N=E1dasi-Donner?= <wonado@...>
Remark: I posted this text in comp.lang.ruby first, but Matz told me,
Does it make sense or is it required to write this as a RCR?
[#11176] FileUtils.rm_rf misfeature? — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11210] Pathname ascend and descend inclusive parameter — TRANS <transfire@...>
I would like to suggest that Pathname#ascend and Pathname#descend
[#11234] Planning to release 1.8.6 errata — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hi all.
On 25/05/07, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#11252] Init_stack and ruby_init_stack fail to reinit stack (threads problem?) — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #11134, was opened at 2007-05-25 12:14
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#11255] ruby_1_8_6 build problem (make install-doc) — johan556@...
Hi!
[#11271] providing better support through rubyforge tracker categories — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to make more categories for the trackers (bugs and patches)
[#11367] BUG: next in lambda: 1.8.6 differs from 1.8.4 and 1.9.0 — David Flanagan <david@...>
A toplevel next statement in a lambda does not return a value in 1.8.6,
[#11368] $2000 USD Reward for help fixing Segmentation Fault in GC — Brent Roman <brent@...>
Hi Brent,
[ ruby-Bugs-5563 ] rdoc/usage uses an uninitalized constant
Bugs item #5563, was opened at 2006-08-30 05:18
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5563&group_id=426
Category: Standard Library
Group: 1.8.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Erik Hollensbe (erikh)
Assigned to: Eric Hodel (drbrain)
Summary: rdoc/usage uses an uninitalized constant
Initial Comment:
requiring rdoc/usage in any environment will cause this error, but since it's heavily dependent on the comments at the top of the file I decided to show that this:
---
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
#
# monkeys
#
require 'rdoc/usage'
---
Generates this:
---
/Users/erikh/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/ri/ri_options.rb:53: uninitialized constant RI::Paths (NameError)
from /Users/erikh/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/usage.rb:72:in `require'
from /Users/erikh/lib/ruby/1.8/rdoc/usage.rb:72
from test.rb:7:in `require'
from test.rb:7
---
I highly suspect (after a cursory viewing) that a "require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths'" in ri_options.rb will do the trick.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobuyoshi Nakada (nobu)
Date: 2007-05-10 09:47
Message:
This bug is fixed in the repository.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Laurent Sansonetti (lrz)
Date: 2006-10-06 03:58
Message:
Another diff that works (for me):
--- lib/rdoc/usage.rb.old 2006-10-05 20:56:19.000000000 +0200
+++ lib/rdoc/usage.rb 2006-10-05 20:56:31.000000000 +0200
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
require 'rdoc/markup/simple_markup'
require 'rdoc/markup/simple_markup/to_flow'
require 'rdoc/ri/ri_formatter'
+require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths'
require 'rdoc/ri/ri_options'
module RDoc
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Toby McLaughlin (jarpy)
Date: 2006-09-15 12:06
Message:
Adding "require 'rdoc/ri/ri_paths'" to ri_options.rb worked for me.
"make test-all" passes both before and after the change.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=5563&group_id=426