ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#8971] fileutils.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

1.36.2.10 (aamine 18-Sep-05): def fu_check_options(options,

5 messages 2006/10/01
[#8972] Re: fileutils.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2006/10/01

Hi,
[#8973] Re: fileutils.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/02

[#8975] Re: fileutils.rb — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/02

Ryan Davis wrote:
[#8987] Re: fileutils.rb — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/03

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#8976] Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2006/10/02
[#8986] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — nobu@... 2006/10/03

Hi,
[#8993] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#8994] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

> $ PATH=$PATH:/tmp/foo ruby -ve "system('id')"
[#8995] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — nobu@... 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#8996] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#9000] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/04

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8978] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5990, was opened at 2006-10-02 10:05

5 messages 2006/10/02
[#8979] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/02

Hi,
[#8990] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — dblack@... 2006/10/03

Hi --
[#8991] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — nobu@... 2006/10/03

Hi,
[#8992] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — "Tom Copeland" <tom@...> 2006/10/03

> > Since this went to the Ruby bug site, it may have been posted by

[#8984] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 15:16

2 messages 2006/10/02
[#9003] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5995 ] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,

[#8988] Business Intelligence Framework — "Mukembo Arthur Jeremiah" <mukembo@...>

Hi there team,

2 messages 2006/10/03
[#8989] Re: Business Intelligence Framework — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/10/03

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 07:35, Mukembo Arthur Jeremiah wrote:

[#8997] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, matz wrote:

77 messages 2006/10/04
[#8998] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#9029] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/08

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9030] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/08

Hi,
[#9031] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9033] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "John Gabriele" <jmg3000@...> 2006/10/09

On 10/8/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9063] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, John Gabriele wrote:
[#9036] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9037] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/09

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9034] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9041] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9042] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9043] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9044] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9045] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9046] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9048] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9047] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9050] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 10:19 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9053] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/09

On 2006.10.10 00:31, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9055] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9056] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9057] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...> 2006/10/09

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9058] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9061] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#9088] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/10

Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#9090] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9091] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/10

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9096] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9093] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/10/10

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9094] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/10

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9073] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/9/06, Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:
[#9054] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9066] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9067] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9071] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9070] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Joshua Haberman <joshua@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 15:20, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9072] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9083] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9084] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9085] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/10/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9086] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9115] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/10/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9118] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9087] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/10

On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9089] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9098] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/10

On 2006.10.10 23:57, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9114] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/10/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9074] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/9/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9092] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Carlos <angus@...> 2006/10/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9102] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/10/10

Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> writes:
[#9103] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9049] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9052] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9051] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — gwtmp01@... 2006/10/09

[#9095] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9097] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9100] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/10/10

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:38:21AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9101] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9148] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9099] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9060] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9075] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/10

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9059] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9076] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/10

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9069] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9035] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9040] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9068] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9117] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...> 2006/10/11

> to_a was too general. All enumerable objects (and even
[#9124] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

Brown, Warren wrote:
[#9125] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/11

> -----Original Message-----
[#9140] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#9144] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9149] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9150] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net writes:
[#9155] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/12

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#8999] making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2006/10/04
[#9005] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,
[#9006] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/05

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9008] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...> 2006/10/05

"Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9009] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/05

Jim Meyering wrote:
[#9010] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/05

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9011] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/10/05

On 10/5/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#9013] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...> 2006/10/06

[resend]
[#9019] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/06

Jim Meyering wrote:
[#9012] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,

[#9002] net/imap chokes on NOMODSEQ response — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6026, was opened at 2006-10-04 20:25

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9004] Bug in logger.rb rotation in multi-process environment — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6031, was opened at 2006-10-05 09:08

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9007] Documentation for String.scan has a bad example. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6034, was opened at 2006-10-05 09:56

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9014] C#'s ?? Operator — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>

Hi!

5 messages 2006/10/06
[#9015] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "Martin Coxall" <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/06

> P.S.
[#9016] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/06

Hi,
[#9017] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "Martin Coxall" <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/06

> Do you mean making (a ?? b) as shorthand for (a.nil? ? a : b)?
[#9018] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/06

Martin Coxall wrote:

[#9020] Bug: right shift (>>) for Bignum? — "Johan Holmberg" <johan556@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2006/10/06
[#9027] Re: Bug: right shift (>>) for Bignum? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/07

Hi,

[#9021] argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

6 messages 2006/10/07
[#9026] Re: argument passing bug — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/07

Hi,
[#9028] Re: argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/08

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9022] Re: argument passing bug — dblack@... 2006/10/07

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9023] Re: argument passing bug — dblack@... 2006/10/07

Hi --
[#9025] Re: argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/07

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#9024] — Shashank Date <sdate@...>

Hi All,

8 messages 2006/10/07
[#9064] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/09

> -----Original Message-----
[#9065] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Shashank Date <sdate@...> 2006/10/09

Hi Dan,
[#9082] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/10/10

Hello,
[#9227] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Shashank Date <sdate@...> 2006/10/18

Hello,
[#9228] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/18

Hi,
[#9355] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/30

Hi,
[#9356] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/30

Hi,

[#9032] REXML cannot parse encoding if space(s) exist around equal — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6066, was opened at 2006-10-09 10:15

1 message 2006/10/09

[#9038] Monitor fails when used in classes supporting constructors — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6069, was opened at 2006-10-09 09:45

2 messages 2006/10/09
[#9039] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6069 ] Monitor fails when used in classes supporting constructors — Francois <fg@...> 2006/10/09

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#9077] how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Is it possible for plain ruby code to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? It

5 messages 2006/10/10
[#9078] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9079] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/10

[#9081] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

[#9080] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,

[#9104] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6090, was opened at 2006-10-10 22:33

6 messages 2006/10/10
[#9105] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9107] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — ville.mattila@... 2006/10/11

[#9112] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/11

[#9137] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/11

As far as deleting elements from a collection while iterating over it, I
[#9153] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/11

Hi,

[#9106] ftp.rb - mget, mput, VERSION, rdoc — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2006/10/11

[#9108] REXML DTD read — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/10/11
[#9113] Re: [patch] REXML DTD read — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

Hiya,

[#9109] How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "Madhusudan Narayan" <madhusudan.narayan@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2006/10/11
[#9110] Re: How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, Madhusudan Narayan <madhusudan.narayan@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9111] Re: How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/10/11

Hello,

[#9116] Date.parse raises NoMethodError — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6102, was opened at 2006-10-11 16:25

2 messages 2006/10/11
[#9170] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6102 ] Date.parse raises NoMethodError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9119] What about 'splay'? — dblack@...

Hi --

37 messages 2006/10/11
[#9120] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/11

> -----Original Message-----
[#9123] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9121] Re: What about 'splay'? — Alex Young <alex@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9122] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 02:32, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9126] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9127] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:55, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9128] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9130] Re: What about 'splay'? — Robin Stocker <robin@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9133] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9145] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:15, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9166] Re: What about 'splay'? — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/12

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9167] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9174] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/12/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9175] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/12/06, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9176] Re: What about 'splay'? — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/12

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9131] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 03:36, Sean Russell wrote:
[#9134] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9136] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 04:19, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9138] Re: What about 'splay'? — gwtmp01@... 2006/10/11

[#9172] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/11/06, gwtmp01@mac.com <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:
[#9139] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9132] Re: What about 'splay'? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/11

On Oct 11, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9146] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 14:56, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9129] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9185] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/15

On 10/11/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9186] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/15

Hi --
[#9187] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/15

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9135] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/11

From: "Eero Saynatkari" <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org>
[#9141] Re: What about 'splay'? — "John Gabriele" <jmg3000@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9156] Re: What about 'splay'? — Martin Coxall <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/12

> "splay" has a couple of possibly not-so-savory connotations, IMO.
[#9161] Re: What about 'splay'? — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2006/10/12

On Oct 12, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Martin Coxall wrote:
[#9162] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9171] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/11/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9173] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2006/10/12

Hello,
[#9151] Re: What about 'splay'? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/11

Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> writes:
[#9182] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/15

On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:32 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#9142] Splatting against the bikeshed — Neil Stevens <neil@...>

My my my, this to_splat discussion is going on a long time. This seems

3 messages 2006/10/11
[#9143] Re: Splatting against the bikeshed — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9147] Re: Splatting against the bikeshed — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 16:24, Neil Stevens wrote:

[#9152] regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

12 messages 2006/10/11
[#9154] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,
[#9157] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/12

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:01:36PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9159] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/12

It's worse:
[#9183] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/15

Hi,
[#9184] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/15

On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
[#9198] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/16

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:33:16PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9200] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9211] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9214] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

2006/10/17, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>:
[#9215] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9219] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,

[#9158] Module#class_variable_defined? — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

4 messages 2006/10/12
[#9165] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9168] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/12

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:13:11PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9169] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9160] Some RDoc fixes (Hash#identical, String#partition) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

1 message 2006/10/12

[#9163] Commit miss? Hash#identical vs. Hash#compare_by_identity — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

2 messages 2006/10/12
[#9164] Re: Commit miss? Hash#identical vs. Hash#compare_by_identity — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9177] singleton : var_ref production and NEW_SELF — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>

Looking at the grammar I am confused why in production 'singleton' there is:

2 messages 2006/10/14
[#9180] Re: singleton : var_ref production and NEW_SELF — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/14

Hi,

[#9178] Readline patch — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2006/10/14
[#9320] Re: Readline patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/22

Hi,

[#9179] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/10/14
[#9181] Re: [BUG] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/14

Hi,
[#9189] Re: [BUG] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — ville.mattila@... 2006/10/15

Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 14.10.2006 19:11:19:

[#9188] Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@...

Hi --

107 messages 2006/10/15
[#9192] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi
[#9193] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/16

Hi --
[#9195] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9212] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9213] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/17

On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9238] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/18

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9243] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:06:02AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9239] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/18

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9245] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/18

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#9246] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9252] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9253] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9249] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/18/06, Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#9251] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9254] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9244] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:06:02AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9255] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9256] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/19

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0900:
[#9257] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9259] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/19

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:49:30PM +0900:
[#9275] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9338] String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/27

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:22:18PM +0900:
[#9339] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/27

Hi,
[#9340] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/27

On 10/27/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9276] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...> 2006/10/19

Sam Roberts wrote:
[#9268] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Kevin Tew <tewk@...> 2006/10/19

Java does this also. The String class is immutable.
[#9297] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, Kevin Tew <tewk@tewk.com> wrote:
[#9319] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/21

mathew wrote:
[#9328] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/21/06, Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#9190] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9191] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/16

Hi --
[#9194] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9196] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9202] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/16/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9203] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/16

On Oct 16, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9204] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/16

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:09AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9205] String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/16

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:09AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9218] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/17

On 10/16/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9220] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9225] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9226] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/18

On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9230] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9231] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/18

On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:18 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9232] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9234] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9236] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#9237] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:24:24AM +0900, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9240] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#9242] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9247] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/18/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9248] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi -
[#9258] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9263] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9296] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9301] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9250] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/19

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9261] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9270] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:16:54PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9271] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#9262] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9264] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9267] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9277] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9278] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < Stringin Ruby > 1.8) — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/19

[#9285] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9286] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9288] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9289] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/20

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9299] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9302] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:08:52AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9307] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9294] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/20

Hi,
[#9295] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9300] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9305] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/20

Hi,
[#9306] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9308] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9311] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9314] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/21

Hi,
[#9315] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9327] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/21/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9325] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/20/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9326] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/24

Hi --
[#9309] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:11:36AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9312] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9310] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9313] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9298] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9304] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9265] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9266] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9269] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9273] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9274] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:50:30PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9280] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9279] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9281] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9233] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/18

On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9235] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9260] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/19

On Oct 18, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9272] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9241] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9229] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/18

Hi,
[#9207] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/16

> -----Original Message-----
[#9223] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/17

On 10/16/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9206] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/16

> -----Original Message-----

[#9197] Ruby Threads — "Abhisek Datta" <abhisek@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2006/10/16
[#9199] Re: Ruby Threads — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9201] Re: Ruby Threads — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/10/16

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:41:22PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9210] Re: Ruby Threads — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/17

Abhisek Datta wrote:

[#9208] RDoc: preserve special chars in <tt> Was: Re: bug in rdoc? — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>

On 10/16/06, Wybo Dekker <wybo@servalys.nl> wrote:

1 message 2006/10/16

[#9209] Net::HTTP off-by-one error in POST data — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6188, was opened at 2006-10-17 00:31

1 message 2006/10/16

[#9216] A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — Vimal <j.vimal@...>

Hi all

3 messages 2006/10/17
[#9217] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/17

Vimal wrote:
[#9224] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/10/17

> Vimal wrote:

[#9221] parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>

I believe these two enums are no unused in parse.y (and resulting

2 messages 2006/10/17
[#9222] Re: parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,

[#9282] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>

I am fairly new to ruby, and I have just started listening to this mailing

9 messages 2006/10/20
[#9284] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/10/20

----- Original Message -----
[#9303] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:24:29PM +0900, Michael Selig wrote:
[#9287] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9290] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/10/20

On Friday 20 October 2006 07:13, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9291] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

Let me side-track a bit:
[#9322] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/10/23

----- Original Message -----
[#9283] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9293] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:

[#9316] test unit addition — Jay <jay@...>

Since Test::Unit is an xUnit port, it's not surprising that defining

3 messages 2006/10/21
[#9321] Re: test unit addition — nobu@... 2006/10/22

Hi,
[#9335] Re: test unit addition — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/10/26

On 10/21/06, Jay <jay@jayfields.com> wrote:

[#9317] The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

At the roundtable discussion with Matz last night, the question was

3 messages 2006/10/21
[#9318] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2006/10/21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#9330] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/25

On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:06 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#9323] DateTime doesn't parse timezone correctly — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6279, was opened at 2006-10-23 05:03

1 message 2006/10/23

[#9324] loading file again doesnt update debugger text — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6282, was opened at 2006-10-23 07:17

1 message 2006/10/23

[#9329] Bitwise inversion of 32 bit numbers with most significant bit set results in overflow — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6314, was opened at 2006-10-25 08:59

1 message 2006/10/25

[#9331] Make open-uri capable of handling HTTP methods other than GET — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6321, was opened at 2006-10-25 16:03

1 message 2006/10/25

[#9332] BigMath::log can be made much faster — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6323, was opened at 2006-10-25 16:32

3 messages 2006/10/25
[#9333] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/26

Hi,
[#9334] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#9336] ruby-fr@ruby-lang.org is broken — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

1 message 2006/10/26

[#9337] blocks with arity of 1 behave inconsistently when passed more or less parameters — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6348, was opened at 2006-10-27 00:15

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9341] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2006/10/27
[#9342] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/27

On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#9343] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Patrick Hurley" <phurley@...> 2006/10/27

On 10/27/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9344] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/27

> -----Original Message-----

[#9345] marshal error with TYPE_SYMLINK — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6358, was opened at 2006-10-27 15:58

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9346] Fix for bug 3245 — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6366, was opened at 2006-10-27 15:50

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9347] Time Changes Zones — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6368, was opened at 2006-10-27 23:45

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9348] Why does Certificate.check_private_key call OSSL_Warning? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

And is there a way to disable this check, other than $-w = false?

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9349] core dump using mkmf — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6369, was opened at 2006-10-27 22:55

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9350] RDoc for Kernel#select same as IO.select — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6370, was opened at 2006-10-28 04:36

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9351] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2006/10/28
[#9352] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2006/10/28

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:26:51AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#9353] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/10/28

Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:
[#9354] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/29

On Oct 28, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:

[#9357] Time Does not Respect Subclasses — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6400, was opened at 2006-10-30 18:20

1 message 2006/10/30

[#9363] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting. — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6418, was opened at 2006-10-31 22:50

2 messages 2006/10/31
[#9400] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6418 ] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting. — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/11/06

Hi,

Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)

From: dblack@...
Date: 2006-10-19 11:59:00 UTC
List: ruby-core #9266 
Hi --

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8)"
>    on Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:36:28 +0900, dblack@wobblini.net writes:
>
> |Otherwise -- if lines is an enumerator, rather than some lines -- it
> |feels to me like Ruby is taking over too much.  It's as if I'm being
> |allowed to say "I want lines from this string", but Ruby knows better:
> |I don't *really* want lines, even if I think I do.
> |
> |That kind of steering away from the semantics of the method names
> |makes me uncomfortable.  If I need an enumerator, I want the language
> |to give me a way to ask for one clearly; and if I ask for "things", I
> |want the things.
>
> Hmm, maybe the name Enumerator does not make you feel like it's a
> collection.  What if Enumerator is renamed to some other name, for
> example, DelayedCollection or something?

Interesting.  That might indeed make it feel more like something I was
asking for.  I still feel, though, like the plain plural "things"
method suggests an actually collection much, much more than it
suggests anything else.  But I'll ponder it some more.


David

-- 
                   David A. Black | dblack@wobblini.net
Author of "Ruby for Rails"   [1] | Ruby/Rails training & consultancy [3]
DABlog (DAB's Weblog)        [2] | Co-director, Ruby Central, Inc.   [4]
[1] http://www.manning.com/black | [3] http://www.rubypowerandlight.com
[2] http://dablog.rubypal.com    | [4] http://www.rubycentral.org

In This Thread

Prev Next