[#8976] Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>
Hi,
[#8978] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #5990, was opened at 2006-10-02 10:05
Hi,
[#8997] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, matz wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Oct 9, 2006, at 10:19 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
On 2006.10.10 00:31, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
Hi --
dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
Thomas Enebo wrote:
Hi --
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
On 10/10/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
Hi --
> to_a was too general. All enumerable objects (and even
Brown, Warren wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
[#8999] making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...>
Hello,
Hi,
"Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9014] C#'s ?? Operator — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
Hi!
[#9021] argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
[#9024] — Shashank Date <sdate@...>
Hi All,
[#9077] how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is it possible for plain ruby code to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? It
[#9104] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — <noreply@...>
Bugs item #6090, was opened at 2006-10-10 22:33
Hi,
[#9119] What about 'splay'? — dblack@...
Hi --
On 2006.10.12 02:32, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:55, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
Hi --
dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
Hi --
On 2006.10.12 03:36, Sean Russell wrote:
On 10/11/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9152] regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)
Hi,
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:01:36PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
It's worse:
Hi,
On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:33:16PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9158] Module#class_variable_defined? — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
[#9188] Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@...
Hi --
Hi
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Jim Weirich wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:06:02AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hi,
Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0900:
Hi,
Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:49:30PM +0900:
Hi,
Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:22:18PM +0900:
On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi,
On 10/16/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On Oct 16, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:09AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On 10/16/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
Hi --
On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:18 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
On 10/18/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
On 10/18/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
On 10/18/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:24:24AM +0900, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 10/18/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
Hi --
On 10/18/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi -
Hi,
Hi --
Rick DeNatale wrote:
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On 10/20/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
Hi --
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:11:36AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
Hi,
On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9197] Ruby Threads — "Abhisek Datta" <abhisek@...>
Hello,
[#9282] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>
I am fairly new to ruby, and I have just started listening to this mailing
[#9341] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>
Hi all,
On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#9351] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>
Hi all,
Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to
On 2006.10.10 23:57, dblack@wobblini.net wrote: > Hi -- > > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, James Edward Gray II wrote: > > >On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote: > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>In message "Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use > >>"to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to" > >> on Tue, 10 Oct 2006 22:36:44 +0900, "Rick DeNatale" > >><rick.denatale@gmail.com> writes: > >> > >>If it's possible, I'd like to hear your feeling against the changes in > >>detail. Can you express? Why don't you right? > > > >I believe I understand where Rick is coming from. > > > >He's saying that when we do a *whatever, we are actively asking that > >whatever be split into values. Because we consciously make that choice, > >to_a (a general solution) is fine. We understand that we are calling to_a > >and willingly accept the consequences. If we want to divide up a string > >into arguments that way, that's our business not Ruby's business. > > > >At least, that's what I *think* he means. Correct me if I'm wrong Rick. > > I've been thinking about the whole thing, and I tend to agree. I'm > not sure why we need a whole star-related sub-system, including a > method hook, independent of the existing array sub-system. I think > the star can be understood as syntactic sugar for to_a. The problem is that * does not just create an Array--in fact, that seems to be the less-used functionality. In most situations, #to_a is the exact opposite of what is happening. If *5 # => [5] Then #to_a is correct. This is what can be considered to happen in method definitions and in the left-hand-side of assignments. What is more, these are not controlled by the user: the only context where the programmer can explicitly affect the result of * is this: *[1, 2] # => 1, 2 (And variations thereof) Here we are definitely NOT doing a #to_a but the exact opposite (whatever it is decreed to be called). I think this is what matz means--correct me if I am wrong :)