ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#8971] fileutils.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

1.36.2.10 (aamine 18-Sep-05): def fu_check_options(options,

5 messages 2006/10/01
[#8972] Re: fileutils.rb — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2006/10/01

Hi,
[#8973] Re: fileutils.rb — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/02

[#8975] Re: fileutils.rb — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/02

Ryan Davis wrote:
[#8987] Re: fileutils.rb — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/03

Jim Weirich wrote:

[#8976] Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...>

Hi,

7 messages 2006/10/02
[#8986] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — nobu@... 2006/10/03

Hi,
[#8993] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#8994] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

> $ PATH=$PATH:/tmp/foo ruby -ve "system('id')"
[#8995] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — nobu@... 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#8996] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — "Laurent Sansonetti" <laurent.sansonetti@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#9000] Re: Insecure warnings on sticky-bit directories — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/04

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8978] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5990, was opened at 2006-10-02 10:05

5 messages 2006/10/02
[#8979] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/02

Hi,
[#8990] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — dblack@... 2006/10/03

Hi --
[#8991] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — nobu@... 2006/10/03

Hi,
[#8992] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5990 ] Inheritance and Autorunner: Default_test causes a problem — "Tom Copeland" <tom@...> 2006/10/03

> > Since this went to the Ruby bug site, it may have been posted by

[#8984] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #5995, was opened at 2006-10-02 15:16

2 messages 2006/10/02
[#9003] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-5995 ] OpenSSL::X509::Certificate.new is broken in the 1.8.5 libraries — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,

[#8988] Business Intelligence Framework — "Mukembo Arthur Jeremiah" <mukembo@...>

Hi there team,

2 messages 2006/10/03
[#8989] Re: Business Intelligence Framework — Marc Haisenko <haisenko@...> 2006/10/03

On Tuesday 03 October 2006 07:35, Mukembo Arthur Jeremiah wrote:

[#8997] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

On Tue, 3 Oct 2006, matz wrote:

77 messages 2006/10/04
[#8998] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/04

Hi,
[#9029] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/08

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9030] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/08

Hi,
[#9031] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9033] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "John Gabriele" <jmg3000@...> 2006/10/09

On 10/8/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9063] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, John Gabriele wrote:
[#9036] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9037] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/09

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9034] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9041] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9042] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9043] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9044] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9045] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9046] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9048] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9047] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9050] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 10:19 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9053] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/09

On 2006.10.10 00:31, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9055] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9056] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9057] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...> 2006/10/09

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9058] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9061] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#9088] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/10

Thomas Enebo wrote:
[#9090] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9091] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/10

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9096] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9093] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/10/10

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9094] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/10

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9073] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/9/06, Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org> wrote:
[#9054] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9066] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9067] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/09

On Oct 9, 2006, at 5:20 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9071] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9070] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Joshua Haberman <joshua@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 15:20, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9072] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9083] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9084] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9085] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/10/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9086] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9115] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/10/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9118] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9087] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/10

On Oct 10, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9089] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9098] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/10

On 2006.10.10 23:57, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9114] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/10/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9074] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/10

On 10/9/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9092] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Carlos <angus@...> 2006/10/10

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9102] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/10/10

Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> writes:
[#9103] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9049] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9052] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/09

Hi --
[#9051] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — gwtmp01@... 2006/10/09

[#9095] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9097] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9100] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/10/10

On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:38:21AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9101] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/10

Hi --
[#9148] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9099] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/10

From: <dblack@wobblini.net>
[#9060] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9075] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/10

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9059] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Mon, 9 Oct 2006, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9076] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/10

Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9069] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9035] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/09

On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9040] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/09

Hi,
[#9068] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/09

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9117] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...> 2006/10/11

> to_a was too general. All enumerable objects (and even
[#9124] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

Brown, Warren wrote:
[#9125] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/11

> -----Original Message-----
[#9140] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

Berger, Daniel wrote:
[#9144] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9149] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9150] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net writes:
[#9155] Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat" instead of "to_ary" to — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/12

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#8999] making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...>

Hello,

10 messages 2006/10/04
[#9005] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,
[#9006] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/05

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9008] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...> 2006/10/05

"Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9009] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/05

Jim Meyering wrote:
[#9010] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/10/05

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9011] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...> 2006/10/05

On 10/5/06, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
[#9013] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Jim Meyering <list+ruby@...> 2006/10/06

[resend]
[#9019] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/06

Jim Meyering wrote:
[#9012] Re: making FileUtils.rm_rf robust: is anyone interested? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/05

Hi,

[#9002] net/imap chokes on NOMODSEQ response — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6026, was opened at 2006-10-04 20:25

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9004] Bug in logger.rb rotation in multi-process environment — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6031, was opened at 2006-10-05 09:08

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9007] Documentation for String.scan has a bad example. — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6034, was opened at 2006-10-05 09:56

1 message 2006/10/05

[#9014] C#'s ?? Operator — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>

Hi!

5 messages 2006/10/06
[#9015] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "Martin Coxall" <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/06

> P.S.
[#9016] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/06

Hi,
[#9017] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "Martin Coxall" <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/06

> Do you mean making (a ?? b) as shorthand for (a.nil? ? a : b)?
[#9018] Re: [FEATURE REQUEST] C#'s ?? Operator — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/06

Martin Coxall wrote:

[#9020] Bug: right shift (>>) for Bignum? — "Johan Holmberg" <johan556@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2006/10/06
[#9027] Re: Bug: right shift (>>) for Bignum? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/07

Hi,

[#9021] argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

6 messages 2006/10/07
[#9026] Re: argument passing bug — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/07

Hi,
[#9028] Re: argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/08

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9022] Re: argument passing bug — dblack@... 2006/10/07

On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
[#9023] Re: argument passing bug — dblack@... 2006/10/07

Hi --
[#9025] Re: argument passing bug — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/10/07

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

[#9024] — Shashank Date <sdate@...>

Hi All,

8 messages 2006/10/07
[#9064] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/09

> -----Original Message-----
[#9065] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Shashank Date <sdate@...> 2006/10/09

Hi Dan,
[#9082] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/10/10

Hello,
[#9227] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Shashank Date <sdate@...> 2006/10/18

Hello,
[#9228] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/18

Hi,
[#9355] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/30

Hi,
[#9356] Re: [Fwd: cross-thread violation on rb_gc()] — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/30

Hi,

[#9032] REXML cannot parse encoding if space(s) exist around equal — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6066, was opened at 2006-10-09 10:15

1 message 2006/10/09

[#9038] Monitor fails when used in classes supporting constructors — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6069, was opened at 2006-10-09 09:45

2 messages 2006/10/09
[#9039] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6069 ] Monitor fails when used in classes supporting constructors — Francois <fg@...> 2006/10/09

noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#9077] how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

Is it possible for plain ruby code to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? It

5 messages 2006/10/10
[#9078] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9079] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/10

[#9081] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

[#9080] Re: how to create a NODE_ARGSPUSH? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,

[#9104] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6090, was opened at 2006-10-10 22:33

6 messages 2006/10/10
[#9105] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/10

Hi,
[#9107] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — ville.mattila@... 2006/10/11

[#9112] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2006/10/11

[#9137] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/11

As far as deleting elements from a collection while iterating over it, I
[#9153] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-6090 ] Loop over array.delete breaks at first hit — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/11

Hi,

[#9106] ftp.rb - mget, mput, VERSION, rdoc — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2006/10/11

[#9108] REXML DTD read — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/10/11
[#9113] Re: [patch] REXML DTD read — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

Hiya,

[#9109] How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "Madhusudan Narayan" <madhusudan.narayan@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2006/10/11
[#9110] Re: How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, Madhusudan Narayan <madhusudan.narayan@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9111] Re: How to call WinAPI in ruby where the parameter I Pass is both Input and Output — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2006/10/11

Hello,

[#9116] Date.parse raises NoMethodError — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6102, was opened at 2006-10-11 16:25

2 messages 2006/10/11
[#9170] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6102 ] Date.parse raises NoMethodError — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9119] What about 'splay'? — dblack@...

Hi --

37 messages 2006/10/11
[#9120] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/11

> -----Original Message-----
[#9123] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9121] Re: What about 'splay'? — Alex Young <alex@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9122] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 02:32, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9126] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9127] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:55, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9128] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9130] Re: What about 'splay'? — Robin Stocker <robin@...> 2006/10/11

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9133] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9145] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 15:15, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9166] Re: What about 'splay'? — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/12

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9167] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9174] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/12/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9175] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/12/06, Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9176] Re: What about 'splay'? — Dave Burt <dave@...> 2006/10/12

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9131] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 03:36, Sean Russell wrote:
[#9134] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9136] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...> 2006/10/11

On 2006.10.12 04:19, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9138] Re: What about 'splay'? — gwtmp01@... 2006/10/11

[#9172] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/11/06, gwtmp01@mac.com <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:
[#9139] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9132] Re: What about 'splay'? — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/11

On Oct 11, 2006, at 1:56 PM, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9146] Re: What about 'splay'? — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 14:56, Eero Saynatkari wrote:
[#9129] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9185] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/15

On 10/11/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9186] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/15

Hi --
[#9187] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/15

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9135] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Bill Kelly" <billk@...> 2006/10/11

From: "Eero Saynatkari" <ruby-ml@kittensoft.org>
[#9141] Re: What about 'splay'? — "John Gabriele" <jmg3000@...> 2006/10/11

On 10/11/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9156] Re: What about 'splay'? — Martin Coxall <pseudo.meta@...> 2006/10/12

> "splay" has a couple of possibly not-so-savory connotations, IMO.
[#9161] Re: What about 'splay'? — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2006/10/12

On Oct 12, 2006, at 2:59 AM, Martin Coxall wrote:
[#9162] Re: What about 'splay'? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9171] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/12

On 10/11/06, John Gabriele <jmg3000@gmail.com> wrote:
[#9173] Re: What about 'splay'? — "Yemi I. D. Bedu" <yemi@...> 2006/10/12

Hello,
[#9151] Re: What about 'splay'? — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/11

Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> writes:
[#9182] Re: What about 'splay'? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/15

On Oct 11, 2006, at 10:32 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#9142] Splatting against the bikeshed — Neil Stevens <neil@...>

My my my, this to_splat discussion is going on a long time. This seems

3 messages 2006/10/11
[#9143] Re: Splatting against the bikeshed — dblack@... 2006/10/11

Hi --
[#9147] Re: Splatting against the bikeshed — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/10/11

On Wednesday 11 October 2006 16:24, Neil Stevens wrote:

[#9152] regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

12 messages 2006/10/11
[#9154] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,
[#9157] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/12

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 01:01:36PM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#9159] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/12

It's worse:
[#9183] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/15

Hi,
[#9184] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/15

On Oct 15, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
[#9198] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/16

On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 05:33:16PM +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#9200] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9211] Re: regular expressions tainting? — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch) 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9214] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

2006/10/17, Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@danisch.de>:
[#9215] Re: regular expressions tainting? — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9219] Re: regular expressions tainting? — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,

[#9158] Module#class_variable_defined? — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

4 messages 2006/10/12
[#9165] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — dblack@... 2006/10/12

Hi --
[#9168] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/12

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:13:11PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9169] Re: [PATCH] Module#class_variable_defined? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9160] Some RDoc fixes (Hash#identical, String#partition) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

1 message 2006/10/12

[#9163] Commit miss? Hash#identical vs. Hash#compare_by_identity — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

2 messages 2006/10/12
[#9164] Re: Commit miss? Hash#identical vs. Hash#compare_by_identity — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/12

Hi,

[#9177] singleton : var_ref production and NEW_SELF — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>

Looking at the grammar I am confused why in production 'singleton' there is:

2 messages 2006/10/14
[#9180] Re: singleton : var_ref production and NEW_SELF — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/14

Hi,

[#9178] Readline patch — Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>

Hi!

2 messages 2006/10/14
[#9320] Re: Readline patch — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/22

Hi,

[#9179] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/10/14
[#9181] Re: [BUG] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/14

Hi,
[#9189] Re: [BUG] make check broken in ruby 1.8 CVS — ville.mattila@... 2006/10/15

Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 14.10.2006 19:11:19:

[#9188] Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@...

Hi --

107 messages 2006/10/15
[#9192] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi
[#9193] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/16

Hi --
[#9195] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9212] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9213] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/17

On Oct 17, 2006, at 1:06 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9238] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/18

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9243] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:06:02AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9239] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/18

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9245] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/18

Jim Weirich wrote:
[#9246] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9252] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9253] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9249] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/18/06, Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#9251] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/19

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9254] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9244] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 05:06:02AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#9255] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9256] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/19

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:40:42PM +0900:
[#9257] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9259] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/19

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 02:49:30PM +0900:
[#9275] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9338] String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/27

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:22:18PM +0900:
[#9339] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/27

Hi,
[#9340] Re: String#== vs. Symbol#== speed (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/27

On 10/27/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9276] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...> 2006/10/19

Sam Roberts wrote:
[#9268] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Kevin Tew <tewk@...> 2006/10/19

Java does this also. The String class is immutable.
[#9297] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, Kevin Tew <tewk@tewk.com> wrote:
[#9319] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/21

mathew wrote:
[#9328] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/21/06, Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@sun.com> wrote:
[#9190] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9191] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — dblack@... 2006/10/16

Hi --
[#9194] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/15/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9196] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9202] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/16

On 10/16/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9203] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/16

On Oct 16, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9204] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/16

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:09AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9205] String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/16

On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 05:14:09AM +0900, James Edward Gray II wrote:
[#9218] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/17

On 10/16/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9220] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,
[#9225] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9226] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/18

On Oct 17, 2006, at 7:29 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9230] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9231] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/18

On Oct 18, 2006, at 4:18 AM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9232] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9234] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9236] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, mathew <meta@pobox.com> wrote:
[#9237] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/18

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 04:24:24AM +0900, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9240] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#9242] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9247] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/18/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9248] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi -
[#9258] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9263] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9296] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9301] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9250] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/19

Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9261] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9270] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 08:16:54PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9271] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#9262] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9264] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9267] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9277] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9278] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < Stringin Ruby > 1.8) — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/19

[#9285] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9286] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Nikolai Weibull <now@bitwi.se> wrote:
[#9288] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9289] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Jim Weirich <jim@...> 2006/10/20

dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9299] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9302] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:08:52AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9307] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9294] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/20

Hi,
[#9295] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9300] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9305] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/20

Hi,
[#9306] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9308] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9311] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9314] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/21

Hi,
[#9315] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9327] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/21/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9325] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/24

On 10/20/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9326] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/24

Hi --
[#9309] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 01:11:36AM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9312] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9310] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> wrote:
[#9313] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/21

Hi --
[#9298] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9304] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Steven Lumos <steven@...> 2006/10/20

Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
[#9265] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/19

Hi,
[#9266] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9269] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9273] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#9274] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:50:30PM +0900, Rick DeNatale wrote:
[#9280] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/10/19

On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9279] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:
[#9281] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/19

Hi --
[#9233] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/18

On Oct 18, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9235] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/18

On 10/18/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9260] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/19

On Oct 18, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
[#9272] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/19

On 10/19/06, Eric Hodel <drbrain@segment7.net> wrote:
[#9241] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — dblack@... 2006/10/18

Hi --
[#9229] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/18

Hi,
[#9207] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? (was Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8) — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/16

> -----Original Message-----
[#9223] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Rick DeNatale" <rick.denatale@...> 2006/10/17

On 10/16/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9206] Re: Symbol < String in Ruby > 1.8 — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/16

> -----Original Message-----

[#9197] Ruby Threads — "Abhisek Datta" <abhisek@...>

Hello,

4 messages 2006/10/16
[#9199] Re: Ruby Threads — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/16

Hi,
[#9201] Re: Ruby Threads — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/10/16

On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:41:22PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#9210] Re: Ruby Threads — Charles Oliver Nutter <Charles.O.Nutter@...> 2006/10/17

Abhisek Datta wrote:

[#9208] RDoc: preserve special chars in <tt> Was: Re: bug in rdoc? — "Jan Svitok" <jan.svitok@...>

On 10/16/06, Wybo Dekker <wybo@servalys.nl> wrote:

1 message 2006/10/16

[#9209] Net::HTTP off-by-one error in POST data — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6188, was opened at 2006-10-17 00:31

1 message 2006/10/16

[#9216] A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — Vimal <j.vimal@...>

Hi all

3 messages 2006/10/17
[#9217] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/17

Vimal wrote:
[#9224] Re: A possible optimization in Bignum/Division? — Ondrej Bilka <neleai@...> 2006/10/17

> Vimal wrote:

[#9221] parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword — Thomas Enebo <Thomas.Enebo@...>

I believe these two enums are no unused in parse.y (and resulting

2 messages 2006/10/17
[#9222] Re: parse.y unused str_sword and str_dword — Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...> 2006/10/17

Hi,

[#9282] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...>

I am fairly new to ruby, and I have just started listening to this mailing

9 messages 2006/10/20
[#9284] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/10/20

----- Original Message -----
[#9303] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/10/20

On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:24:29PM +0900, Michael Selig wrote:
[#9287] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9290] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/10/20

On Friday 20 October 2006 07:13, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
[#9291] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

Let me side-track a bit:
[#9322] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Michael Selig" <michael.selig@...> 2006/10/23

----- Original Message -----
[#9283] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — dblack@... 2006/10/20

Hi --
[#9293] Re: String not enumerable, what about IO? — "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...> 2006/10/20

On 10/20/06, Ola Bini <ola.bini@ki.se> wrote:

[#9316] test unit addition — Jay <jay@...>

Since Test::Unit is an xUnit port, it's not surprising that defining

3 messages 2006/10/21
[#9321] Re: test unit addition — nobu@... 2006/10/22

Hi,
[#9335] Re: test unit addition — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...> 2006/10/26

On 10/21/06, Jay <jay@jayfields.com> wrote:

[#9317] The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — James Edward Gray II <james@...>

At the roundtable discussion with Matz last night, the question was

3 messages 2006/10/21
[#9318] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — "NAKAMURA, Hiroshi" <nakahiro@...> 2006/10/21

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#9330] Re: The Plan for Speeding Up CSV — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/25

On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:06 AM, NAKAMURA, Hiroshi wrote:

[#9323] DateTime doesn't parse timezone correctly — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6279, was opened at 2006-10-23 05:03

1 message 2006/10/23

[#9324] loading file again doesnt update debugger text — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6282, was opened at 2006-10-23 07:17

1 message 2006/10/23

[#9329] Bitwise inversion of 32 bit numbers with most significant bit set results in overflow — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6314, was opened at 2006-10-25 08:59

1 message 2006/10/25

[#9331] Make open-uri capable of handling HTTP methods other than GET — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6321, was opened at 2006-10-25 16:03

1 message 2006/10/25

[#9332] BigMath::log can be made much faster — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6323, was opened at 2006-10-25 16:32

3 messages 2006/10/25
[#9333] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/10/26

Hi,
[#9334] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6323 ] BigMath::log can be made much faster — "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@...> 2006/10/26

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#9336] ruby-fr@ruby-lang.org is broken — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>

1 message 2006/10/26

[#9337] blocks with arity of 1 behave inconsistently when passed more or less parameters — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6348, was opened at 2006-10-27 00:15

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9341] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2006/10/27
[#9342] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/10/27

On Oct 27, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#9343] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Patrick Hurley" <phurley@...> 2006/10/27

On 10/27/06, James Edward Gray II <james@grayproductions.net> wrote:
[#9344] Re: [PATCH] array.c - defining aliases as aliases — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/10/27

> -----Original Message-----

[#9345] marshal error with TYPE_SYMLINK — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6358, was opened at 2006-10-27 15:58

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9346] Fix for bug 3245 — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6366, was opened at 2006-10-27 15:50

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9347] Time Changes Zones — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6368, was opened at 2006-10-27 23:45

1 message 2006/10/27

[#9348] Why does Certificate.check_private_key call OSSL_Warning? — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

And is there a way to disable this check, other than $-w = false?

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9349] core dump using mkmf — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6369, was opened at 2006-10-27 22:55

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9350] RDoc for Kernel#select same as IO.select — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6370, was opened at 2006-10-28 04:36

1 message 2006/10/28

[#9351] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — "Daniel Berger" <djberg96@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2006/10/28
[#9352] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — "Marcel Molina Jr." <marcel@...> 2006/10/28

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 04:26:51AM +0900, Daniel Berger wrote:
[#9353] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/10/28

Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:
[#9354] Re: [RCR] Module#method_aliased and Module#singleton_method_aliased — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/10/29

On Oct 28, 2006, at 12:47 PM, Marcel Molina Jr. wrote:

[#9357] Time Does not Respect Subclasses — <noreply@...>

Bugs item #6400, was opened at 2006-10-30 18:20

1 message 2006/10/30

[#9363] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting. — <noreply@...>

Patches item #6418, was opened at 2006-10-31 22:50

2 messages 2006/10/31
[#9400] Re: [ ruby-Patches-6418 ] The overriding of signals by the interpreter does not restore the siginfo setting. — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/11/06

Hi,

Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2006-10-11 18:28:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #9125 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel VanderWerf [mailto:vjoel@path.berkeley.edu] 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 12:21 PM
> To: ruby-core@ruby-lang.org
> Subject: Re: [ruby-cvs:18323] ruby: * eval.c (splat_value): 
> use "to_splat"instead of "to_ary" to
> 
> 
> Brown, Warren wrote:
> >> to_a was too general.  All enumerable objects (and even
> >> more) have to_a method.  to_ary was too narrow.  Only
> >> array compatible objects have to_ary.  I wanted
> >> something in between.
> > 
> >     Without sounding too flippant, why not "to_ar"?  It 
> would be "in 
> > between" to_a and to_ary in all senses.  It would very easy to 
> > remember too.
> 
> I thought that method was used to render strings into Pirate-speak.
> 
> "Hello".to_ar   # ==> "Avast!"

Maybe it wasn't actually .to_ar.  Perhaps he was killed while dictating:

"It's the legendary black method of .to_arrrrrrrrr...."

- Dan


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.

In This Thread

Prev Next