[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
Hi Eric,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[ruby-core:61716] [CommonRuby - Feature #9678] New heredoc syntax
Issue #9678 has been updated by Alexey Muranov.
I try to summarize again, hopefully better, and with a bit different syntax.
### Example
class C
def f(x)
print <<Message1: + <<Message2: + <<Message3:
Message1:
> 1. Some text
> without any intepolation (#{ x }) or escape sequences (\n)
>
Message2:
>> 2. Some text\
>> with interpolation (#{ x }) and escape sequences.\n
Message3:
>> 3. Some mixed text: \
> #{ x } is replaced with
>> #{ x }
end
end
C.new.f(42)
should print
1. Some text
without any intepolation (#{ x }) or escape sequences (\n)
2. Some text with interpolation (42) and escape sequences.
3. Some mixed text: #{ x } is replaced with
42
### Explanation
In each line preceeded with single `>`, the leading `>` and one space are
removed, and the rest is interpreted as a single-quoted string:
> <line content>
is the same as
'<line content>
'
In each line preceeded with `>>`, the leading `>>` and one space are
removed, and the rest is interpreted as a double-quoted string:
>> <line content>
is the same as
"<line content>
"
Then lines are concatenated.
I hope my proposal is more clear now.
----------------------------------------
Feature #9678: New heredoc syntax
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9678#change-45959
* Author: Alexey Muranov
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
For whatever it is worth, i've just had this idea of a new heredoc syntax for some programming language:
class C
def f(x)
print >>Message1 + >>Message2
Message1:
> Literal text
> ------------
> Here text.
>
Message2:
>> Text with interpolation and escapes
>> -----------------------------------
>> Here text with interpolation: #{ x }.
>>
end
end
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/