[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
Hi Eric,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[ruby-core:61273] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9589] Stack level too deep during eval causes segmentation fault
Issue #9589 has been updated by Cezary Baginski.
Not sure if it's related, but I'm getting segfaults instead of SystemStackErrors with recursive lambda calls from:
example_spec.rb:
`describe Fixnum do
subject { subject }
it { should be }
end`
by running:
`rspec example_spec.rb`
using this version of rspec:
`rspec (2.14.1)
rspec-core (2.14.8)`
Both on:
`ruby 2.1.1p76 (2014-02-24 revision 45161) [x86_64-linux]`
and:
`ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-03-04 trunk 45264) [x86_64-linux]`
but the debug build of 2.2.0 (-O0 and -ggdb3) gives SystemStackError as expected.
(all examples compiled with gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.3-1ubuntu1) 4.7.3)
----------------------------------------
Bug #9589: Stack level too deep during eval causes segmentation fault
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9589#change-45608
* Author: carlos aya
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 1.9.3
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
The following silly code, which imho should generate a " stack level too deep (SystemStackError)", segfaults
$ echo 'eval($_)' | ruby -n -e 'eval($_)'
I thought it may be a bug, not sure.
My version:
carlos-mac$ ruby -v
ruby 1.9.3p327 (2012-11-10) [x86_64-darwin12.2.0]
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/