[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
3 messages
2014/03/01
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/03
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
5 messages
2014/03/07
[#61360] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/07
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#61362] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/07
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
13 messages
2014/03/12
[#61466] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/13
Hi Eric,
[#61471] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/13
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61508] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/15
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61509] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/15
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/13
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/14
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
7 messages
2014/03/17
[#61605] Re: hash function for global method cache
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/20
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61606] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/20
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61631] Re: hash function for global method cache
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2014/03/22
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
[#61632] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/22
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/26
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/30
[ruby-core:61252] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9588] program name variables tainted
From:
shyouhei@...
Date:
2014-03-03 10:59:30 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61252
Issue #9588 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
My expectation to tainted.rb output is what 1.8.7 outputs. This seems like a regression to me.
----------------------------------------
Bug #9588: program name variables tainted
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9588#change-45592
* Author: Jan Rusnacko
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: 1.8.7, 1.9.3, 2.0.0
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
I have noticed inconsistency in taint flag of program name:
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ cat tainted.rb
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
puts "$0: #{$0}, tainted? #{$0.tainted?}"
puts "__FILE__: #{__FILE__}, tainted? #{__FILE__.tainted?}"
puts "$PROGRAM_NAME: #{$PROGRAM_NAME}, tainted? #{$PROGRAM_NAME.tainted?}"
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ rvm use 1.8.7
Using /home/jrusnack/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.8.7-p374
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ ./tainted.rb
$0: ./tainted.rb, tainted? true
__FILE__: ./tainted.rb, tainted? false
$PROGRAM_NAME: ./tainted.rb, tainted? true
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ rvm use 1.9.3
Using /home/jrusnack/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p484
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ ./tainted.rb
$0: ./tainted.rb, tainted? false
__FILE__: ./tainted.rb, tainted? true
$PROGRAM_NAME: ./tainted.rb, tainted? false
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ rvm use 2.0.0
Using /home/jrusnack/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p353
[jrusnack@dhcp-31-42 ruby-safe]$ ./tainted.rb
$0: ./tainted.rb, tainted? false
__FILE__: ./tainted.rb, tainted? true
$PROGRAM_NAME: ./tainted.rb, tainted? false
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/