[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
3 messages
2014/03/01
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/03
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
5 messages
2014/03/07
[#61360] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/07
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#61362] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/07
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
13 messages
2014/03/12
[#61466] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/13
Hi Eric,
[#61471] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/13
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61508] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/15
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61509] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/15
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/13
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/14
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
7 messages
2014/03/17
[#61605] Re: hash function for global method cache
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/20
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61606] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/20
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61631] Re: hash function for global method cache
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2014/03/22
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
[#61632] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/22
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/26
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/30
[ruby-core:61290] [ruby-trunk - Bug #8666] [Closed] Unable to set OpenSSL GCM iv_length in Ruby
From:
shibata.hiroshi@...
Date:
2014-03-04 12:57:40 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61290
Issue #8666 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA.
Status changed from Open to Closed
ruby -v set to -
Duplicate #8667
----------------------------------------
Bug #8666: Unable to set OpenSSL GCM iv_length in Ruby
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/8666#change-45622
* Author: Anonymous
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: -
* Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
Hello,
In OpenSSL you are allowed to change the iv_length on an AES-BCM cipher. (
http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/EVP_EncryptInit.html#GCM_Mode) However
this was not implemented in the ruby-wrapper. Since I am a novice in C and
OpenSSL I think by no means my supplied patch is complete, it is a start
however. Maybe this missing function can be added to Ruby 2.0?
You can now set the iv_length using:
cipher = OpenSSL::Cipher.new('aes-128-gcm').encrypt
cipher.iv_len = 16
An issue I already spotted is that OpenSSL sets the ivlen on the
cipher_data (snippet from OpenSSL crypto/evp/e_aes.c):
EVP_AES_GCM_CTX *gctx = c->cipher_data;
gctx->ivlen = arg;
and not the c->cipher->iv_len. So querying for the iv_len in ruby by using
cipher.iv_len will still report the default which is 12. Encryption however
is done correctly using the new iv-length. I tested it by comparing it to
results from other programming languages (Java and C#).
Regards Andres
---Files--------------------------------
ossl_set_iv_length.patch (1.25 KB)
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/