[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
Hi Eric,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[ruby-core:61337] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9525] Stuck with Socket.pack_sockaddr_in
Issue #9525 has been updated by Naotoshi Seo. Naotoshi Seo wrote: > EDIT: In details, I met 3 times out of 36 times that process is stuck with this case too, but > these processes were died after 300sec, 100sec, 300sec passed respectively. I am not sure what the second mean. > Actually, I sent CONT signal to get sigdump https://github.com/frsyuki/sigdump, and next tried to gcore, but the process was not lived any more at that time. So, I could not get core file. The result of sigdump is available at https://gist.github.com/sonots/9392668 I could reproduce the same thing by 4 additional restarts. In this time, I waited until the process terminates without sending CONT signal or gcore. Then, I found that the process does not die even after 300sec passed. I sent CONT signal, then the process died. So, `Stuck with Socket.pack_sockaddr_in` was resolved, but now Fluentd gets stuck at the different point. See https://gist.github.com/sonots/9392668 ---------------------------------------- Bug #9525: Stuck with Socket.pack_sockaddr_in https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9525#change-45660 * Author: Naotoshi Seo * Status: Closed * Priority: Normal * Assignee: * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: 1.9.3p194 * Backport: 1.9.3: REQUIRED, 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED ---------------------------------------- We met this trouble with Fluentd https://github.com/fluent/fluentd. Fluentd is sometimes stuck at `Socket.pack_sockaddr_in` line on shutdown. Here is the gist https://gist.github.com/sonots/9047653 to explain details. -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/