[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
3 messages
2014/03/01
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/03
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
5 messages
2014/03/07
[#61360] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/07
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
[#61362] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/07
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
13 messages
2014/03/12
[#61466] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/13
Hi Eric,
[#61471] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/13
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61508] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/15
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61509] Re: [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/15
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/13
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
4 messages
2014/03/14
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
7 messages
2014/03/17
[#61605] Re: hash function for global method cache
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2014/03/20
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
[#61606] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/20
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61631] Re: hash function for global method cache
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2014/03/22
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
[#61632] Re: hash function for global method cache
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2014/03/22
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/26
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
3 messages
2014/03/30
[ruby-core:61175] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9584] RGenGC regression in CoW sharing
From:
normalperson@...
Date:
2014-03-01 10:09:55 UTC
List:
ruby-core #61175
Issue #9584 has been updated by Eric Wong. ko1@atdot.net wrote: > Does it help for CoW friendly? > > Basically, promoted bit is changed only for young objects. > To make young object, pages are marked dirty. Yes, but look again at the SHARED_* numbers from nari's test code. #define USE_RGENGC 0 shares more memory. > And also, I'm worry about WB performance. I doubt it's much difference. I haven't been able to fix my bitmap patch to test performance (can't finish build, even). I suspect it's fake objects, I marked some with FL_PERMANENT but maybe I missed some. If you have time, can you please take a look? ---------------------------------------- Bug #9584: RGenGC regression in CoW sharing https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9584#change-45536 * Author: Eric Wong * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Koichi Sasada * Category: * Target version: * ruby -v: ruby 2.2.0dev (2014-02-17 trunk 45028) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: 1.9.3: UNKNOWN, 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN ---------------------------------------- I just changed USE_RGENGC in ruby.h (and made r45224) Using Nari-san's original test for bitmap marking GC: https://github.com/authorNari/skkzipcode.git rgengc enabled: (default) PROCESS_CNT : 5 SHARED_AVE : 81644.0 kb SHARED_TOTAL: 408220 kb PRIV_AVE : 87692.0 kb PRIV_TOTAL : 438460 kb REQ/SEC : 0.003136 rgengc disabled: PROCESS_CNT : 5 SHARED_AVE : 117307.2 kb SHARED_TOTAL: 586536 kb PRIV_AVE : 44453.6 kb PRIV_TOTAL : 222268 kb REQ/SEC : 0.002963 I started using bitmaps, but it seems there are some places where my code is buggy. I haven't had more time to investigate, yet. My work-in-progress is attached. ---Files-------------------------------- rgengc-bitmap-promoted-wip.diff (9.22 KB) -- http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/