[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
Hi Eric,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[ruby-core:61284] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9590] introduce st_foreach_update and st_foreach_update_check for performance.
Issue #9590 has been updated by Masaya Tarui.
Tracker changed from Bug to Feature
----------------------------------------
Feature #9590: introduce st_foreach_update and st_foreach_update_check for performance.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9590#change-45616
* Author: Masaya Tarui
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: Masaya Tarui
* Category: core
* Target version: current: 2.2.0
----------------------------------------
Hello,
I think I'll introduce st_foreach_update and st_foreach_update_check for performance.
For example, it is effective at Hash's rehash,dup and clone. (included in patch)
Are there any problem?
Patch is at https://gist.github.com/tarui/9345180 and attached here.
Some benchmarks are shown below.
<pre>
$cat test.rb
require 'benchmark'
N=10**6
a={}
Benchmark.bm(8) do |x|
x.report("create") { N.times{|i| a[i] = i} }
x.report("rehash") { a.rehash }
x.report("dup") { a.dup }
x.report("clone") { a.clone }
end
$ original_ruby test.rb
user system total real
create 0.730000 0.050000 0.780000 ( 0.788674)
rehash 1.030000 0.080000 1.110000 ( 1.113006)
dup 1.120000 0.050000 1.170000 ( 1.175618)
clone 1.300000 0.010000 1.310000 ( 1.312528)
$ proposed_ruby test.rb
user system total real
create 0.710000 0.050000 0.760000 ( 0.758993)
rehash 0.020000 0.000000 0.020000 ( 0.018409)
dup 0.130000 0.050000 0.180000 ( 0.182608)
clone 0.500000 0.000000 0.500000 ( 0.509430)
$ make gcbench-rdoc | tail -n8|head -n2
original_ruby:
user system total real
159.630000 2.870000 162.500000 (163.414495)
proposed_ruby:
user system total real
152.920000 2.730000 155.650000 (156.040741)
</pre>
---Files--------------------------------
0001-introduce-st_foreach_update-st_foreach_update_check.patch (7.58 KB)
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/