[#61171] Re: [ruby-changes:33145] normal:r45224 (trunk): gc.c: fix build for testing w/o RGenGC — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
(2014/03/01 16:15), normal wrote:
[#61243] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9425] [PATCH] st: use power-of-two sizes to avoid slow modulo ops — normalperson@...
Issue #9425 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61359] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9609] [Open] [PATCH] vm_eval.c: fix misplaced RB_GC_GUARDs — normalperson@...
Issue #9609 has been reported by Eric Wong.
(2014/03/07 19:09), normalperson@yhbt.net wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61424] [REJECT?] xmalloc/xfree: reduce atomic ops w/ thread-locals — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I'm unsure about this. I _hate_ the extra branches this adds;
Hi Eric,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
(2014/03/14 2:12), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#61452] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [Open] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61496] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9638] [Open] [PATCH] limit IDs to 32-bits on 64-bit systems — normalperson@...
Issue #9638 has been reported by Eric Wong.
[#61568] hash function for global method cache — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
I came upon this because I noticed existing st numtable worked poorly
(2014/03/18 8:03), Eric Wong wrote:
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
what's the profit from using binary tree in place of hash?
Юрий Соколов <funny.falcon@gmail.com> wrote:
[#61687] [ruby-trunk - Bug #9606] Ocassional SIGSEGV inTestException#test_machine_stackoverflow on OpenBSD — normalperson@...
Issue #9606 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[#61760] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9632] [PATCH 0/2] speedup IO#close with linked-list from ccan — normalperson@...
Issue #9632 has been updated by Eric Wong.
[ruby-core:61387] [ruby-trunk - Feature #9552] Module map!
Issue #9552 has been updated by Boris Stitnicky.
I apologize for the late response. Again, I experienced that the method I'm proposing here has much practical use in my code. As for a better name, I can think of:
`#compose` --- weight: 3 -- as in functional composition
`#apply` --- weight: 1 -- as in functional application
`#chain` --- weight: 4 -- as in method chaining
`#compose` is perhaps the most politically correct. While `#apply` is not theoretically incorrect, the word too generic (much like `using`) and overloads the metalanguage (English speaking about Ruby) too much. From these newly made up options, I personally prefer `#chain`, which is sufficiently rare, expressive, and short to boot. I will be renaming `Module#map!` to `Module#chain` in my personal library, too -- thank you for forcing me to think.
----------------------------------------
Feature #9552: Module map!
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/9552#change-45698
* Author: Boris Stitnicky
* Status: Feedback
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Category:
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
I would like to beg for `map!` directive in `Module`. I can imitate it with this code:
```ruby
class Module
def map! **hash, &block
hash.each_pair { |mapped_method_symbol, original_method_symbol|
define_method mapped_method_symbol do |*args, &b|
block.( send original_method_symbol, *args, &b )
end
}
end
end
```
And then
```ruby
class Foo; attr_accessor :name end
class Bar; attr_accessor :name end
class Baz; attr_accessor :name end
class FooBarBazCollection < Array
def foos; select { |e| e.is_a? Place } end
def bars; select { |e| e.is_a? Transition } end
def bazs; select { |e| e.is_a? Arc } end
map! fn: :foos, barn: :bars, bazn: :bazs do |retval| retval.map &:name end
end
```
I solemnly declare that I have encountered this pattern in my work on Petri net gem sufficiently many times to warrant this meta approach. The above method `#map!` is not perfect, because it makes the "mapped" methods more omnivorous -- accepting even such sets of arguments, for which the originals returned `ArgumentError`. I do not know how to solve this without asking for a core-level solution.
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/