[#48729] [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語はあとで
Hi,
Hello Vit,
2012/11/6 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>
[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2012/11/03 10:11), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
(2012/11/03 10:36), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#48774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
[#48819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7271][Assigned] Refinement doesn't seem lexical — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#48882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48964] [Backport93 - Backport #7285][Assigned] some failures on RubyInstaller CI — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#49078] Re: [ruby-cvs:44714] marcandre:r37544 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revisions r33453, r37542: — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#49119] ID_ALLOCATOR ? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
Can I see ruby-prof code?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:14 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#49267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7340][Open] 'each_with' or 'into' alias for 'each_with_object' — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49268] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7341][Open] Enumerable#associate — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49282] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
Hello,
2012/11/13 U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>:
[#49298] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7346][Open] object(...) as syntax sugar for object.call(...) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
[#49320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#49328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7349][Open] Struct#inspect needs more meaningful output — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#49340] bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
I've been unable to access it since morning EET (about 6 hours now).
It's almost 3am in Japan now, don't forget.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net> wrote:
[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the
2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.
I could add my eyes to monitor the github issues/pull requests, if only to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>
[#49370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7358][Open] Wrong fd redirection on fork — "felipec (Felipe Contreras)" <felipe.contreras@...>
[#49416] make check: missing psych — Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +0900, vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
Dne 17.11.2012 21:19, Aaron Patterson napsal(a):
On 17 November 2012 21:34, V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
[#49468] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7378][Open] Adding Pathname#write — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>
[#49479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7379][Open] Unexpected result of Kernel#gets on Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
[#49518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7383][Open] Use stricter cache check in load.c — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
[#49536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7388][Open] Object#embed — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7390][Open] Funny Falcon Threads — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49868] How to stop spam from ruby-core — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Hi,
[#49949] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426][Assigned] Update Rdoc — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
(2012/11/27 13:33), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#50264] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7457][Open] GC.stat to return "allocated object count" and "freed object count" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#50306] Towards a better process for changing Ruby — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
What I'd like to see is primarily better communication and release
Hello Magnus,
Endoh-san,
[#50312] How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
HI,
Hi,
[#50372] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7476][Open] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets. — "elico (Eliezer Croitoru)" <eliezer@...>
2013/2/24 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[ruby-core:49656] [Ruby 1.8 - Feature #4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
Issue #4239 has been updated by wing (wing blair).
http://www.facebook.com/idateasiapage
http://twitter.com/idateasia
http://about.me/idateasia
http://asianbeauties.jux.com/
http://www.pheed.com/asianbeauties
----------------------------------------
Feature #4239: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/4239#change-33173
Author: sorah (Shota Fukumori)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: shyouhei (Shyouhei Urabe)
Category: core
Target version: Ruby 1.8.8
=begin
###########################
# This issue is translated from #4207.
# For Japanese: This translation needs proofreading. If you have a patch, please send to sorah[at]tubusu[dot]net.
# Newer version of translation available at: https://gist.github.com/b2c4f223d3ee0bca72ad
###########################
# http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4207
= Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
Hi,
I know that we cannot release ruby_1_8 branch... more than anyone.
But the time past 3 years from 1.9.0, and 2.5 years from 1.8.7;
it will be turned to 3 years in June 2011.
Why I'm marking "3 years," because releasing interval over 3 years
first time ever, and almost systems have revised after 3 years from
developed in my experience... so, almost codes which targets 1.8.7
preparing to revised; I think.
Well, Which version used when codes which targets 1.8.7 are revised,
I recommend 1.9.2 on my post, but almost can't use 1.9.x in
actuality. Like, Extension libraries doesn't work.
When can't use 1.9.x in codes, so it means use only 1.8.7. but it is
really tough, for making tasks with 1.8.7, and I think that when I
can give up maintaining 1.8.7? when my motivation is decreasing in
future, it won't increase again. So I want to use new version,
and don't use 1.8.7. New codes must target newer versions.
So, I want to set directions about 1.8.x future. I'm considing that
destroy ruby_1_8 branch and we won't release 1.8.8 for a one of
ideas. If we won't release 1.8.8, it means that can publish
announcement about 1.8.7 is last version of 1.8 branch,then 1.8
goes to last maintainance release. ah, in simplicity developers
task is decreased; developers will be happy.
P.S.: I hope that people in a posision like Endoh Yusuke at 1.9.2.
Anyone?
###
# http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4207#note-6
Well, Organize this issue without my factors, currently we have the following
issues of 1.8.8.
* the time past 3 years from 1.9.0 released. In last 3 years, We released
1.9.2 smoothly at 1.9 branch. Thanks Yugui (Yuki Sonoda).
Also many users are using 1.9.x at forms of RailsDevCon.
http://railsdevcon.jp/RailsDevCon2010report.pdf
* 1.8.8 (and 1.8.7?) is on migration step to 1.9, but if we continue
developing 1.8.8 at this rate and release 1.8.8 in 2020, do users which
haven't migrated to 1.9 exist?
* Currently does ruby_1_8 include any prompting structures to migrate
1.9.x more than 1.8.7 at all? Just not merged same patches as 1.9?
* "I want to release so I release. Any users didn't effect." is a one of
views, but it makes unhappy by recognition differences?
So.. Because 1.8 mustn't let be uncontrolled,
I propose the following ideas which possible:
1. Not today but ASAP, release 1.8.8 as "better 1.8.7." Release goal is this
Summer.
2. Develop 1.8.8 until it's approached to ideal. Users can't be affect.
Release goal is 2020 Christmas.
3. We won't release 1.8.8 never. Drop.
4. Otherwise I haven't thought yet.
I don't specify any idea for adoption.
Anyhow, I think that 1.8 mustn't keep current principle, so I asking "What do we do?"
Well.. what do we do?
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/