[#48729] [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語はあとで
Hi,
Hello Vit,
2012/11/6 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>
[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2012/11/03 10:11), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
(2012/11/03 10:36), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#48774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
[#48819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7271][Assigned] Refinement doesn't seem lexical — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#48882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48964] [Backport93 - Backport #7285][Assigned] some failures on RubyInstaller CI — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#49078] Re: [ruby-cvs:44714] marcandre:r37544 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revisions r33453, r37542: — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#49119] ID_ALLOCATOR ? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
Can I see ruby-prof code?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:14 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#49267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7340][Open] 'each_with' or 'into' alias for 'each_with_object' — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49268] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7341][Open] Enumerable#associate — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49282] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
Hello,
2012/11/13 U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>:
[#49298] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7346][Open] object(...) as syntax sugar for object.call(...) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
[#49320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#49328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7349][Open] Struct#inspect needs more meaningful output — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#49340] bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
I've been unable to access it since morning EET (about 6 hours now).
It's almost 3am in Japan now, don't forget.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net> w=
[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the
2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.
I could add my eyes to monitor the github issues/pull requests, if only to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>
[#49370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7358][Open] Wrong fd redirection on fork — "felipec (Felipe Contreras)" <felipe.contreras@...>
[#49416] make check: missing psych — Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +0900, vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
Dne 17.11.2012 21:19, Aaron Patterson napsal(a):
On 17 November 2012 21:34, V=EDt Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
[#49468] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7378][Open] Adding Pathname#write — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>
[#49479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7379][Open] Unexpected result of Kernel#gets on Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
[#49518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7383][Open] Use stricter cache check in load.c — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
[#49536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7388][Open] Object#embed — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7390][Open] Funny Falcon Threads — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49868] How to stop spam from ruby-core — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Hi,
[#49949] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426][Assigned] Update Rdoc — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
(2012/11/27 13:33), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#50264] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7457][Open] GC.stat to return "allocated object count" and "freed object count" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#50306] Towards a better process for changing Ruby — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
What I'd like to see is primarily better communication and release
Hello Magnus,
Endoh-san,
[#50312] How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
HI,
Hi,
[#50372] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7476][Open] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets. — "elico (Eliezer Croitoru)" <eliezer@...>
2013/2/24 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[ruby-core:50342] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods
In message "Re: [ruby-core:50338] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods"
on Fri, 30 Nov 2012 04:05:15 +0900, "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@headius.com> writes:
|I assume this is so that refinement methods will see each other, yes?
Yes.
|module X
| refine String do
| def foo; :foo; end
| def bar; foo; end # should be able to call foo
| end
|end
|
|So all call sites within a refine block must look for refinements. Now...I would assume they can only see refinements in the same block, but...
No, whole refinement provided by module X can be seen from refine
block in module X.
|This is incredibly confusing to me. Why are the String refinements active within the refine Array block? That module:
|
|* Is not within the refine String block
|* Is not within a file that uses the String refinement
|* Does not refine String
|
|Why can it see the String refinements even though it's not in a "using" file and not within a refine String block?
Because it's within the body of refinement module X. Since both
refinements are defined in the same refinement, we consider they are
related (you can't see the relation from this silly examples).
|> Refinements should come before normal methods, so super in the normal
|> method will not see a refined method, and super in the refined method
|> will see a normal method (or other refined method if refinements are
|> stacked).
|
|By stacking, I assume you mean something like this:
|
|class String
| def bar; p :base; end
|end
|
|module M1
| refine String do
| def bar; p :m1; super end
| end
|end
|
|module M2
| refine String do
| def bar; p :m2; super; end
| end
|end
|
|using M1
|using M2
|
|"".bar # => should print :m2, :m1, :base
|
|Correct?
Correct.
|My idea of *actually* putting refinements into the hierarchy seems like it might fit this best, rather than searching two hierarchies. Will have to think about it more.
It makes refinement decoration quite unpredictable. For example,
module M
refine Integer do
def /(n); self / n.to_f; end
end
end
using M
1 / 2 # => you expect 0.5
But if refinements are searched through inheritaance hierarchy, it
won't work since there's Fixnum#/.
|> Any more questions?
|
|Yes, lots! :)
I will answer each of them later.
matz.