From: "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
Date: 2013-01-09T02:31:29+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:51319] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7414] Now that const_get supports "Foo::Bar" syntax, so should const_defined?.


Issue #7414 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).


I vote for false in both cases, like defined? operator.
----------------------------------------
Feature #7414: Now that const_get supports "Foo::Bar" syntax, so should const_defined?.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7414#change-35288

Author: robertgleeson (Robert Gleeson)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
Category: 
Target version: 2.0.0


class Foo
end
Object.const_get "Object::Foo" => Foo
Object.const_defined? "Object::Foo" => NameError (expected true).


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/