From: "nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)" <nagachika00@...>
Date: 2012-11-16T14:38:34+09:00
Subject: [ruby-core:49407] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7348] marshaling an object by a float does not work


Issue #7348 has been updated by nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga).

File flonum_marshal_dump.patch added
Category set to core
Assignee changed from ko1 (Koichi Sasada) to nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)
Target version set to 2.0.0

hello,

I've investigated about this issue.
When flonum is introduced at r36798, flonum is treated as immediate value in w_object(), but is should treated as reference value.
I will attach a patch. This patch introduce a trivial incompatibility. All flonum of same value are dumped as reference of same Float object. I don't think this is not a practical problem.

 (on flonum supported environment)
 a = [2.0, 2.0, 2.0]
 File.write("dump.txt", Marshal.dump(a))

 (on flonum not supported environment)
 a = Marshal.load(File.read("dump.txt"))
 a.map{|f| f.object_id}  # => [70180445290980, 70180445290980, 70180445290980]

If there's no objection, I'll check-in it tonight (in JST).
----------------------------------------
Bug #7348: marshaling an object by a float does not work
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7348#change-32953

Author: tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: nagachika (Tomoyuki Chikanaga)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
ruby -v: ruby 2.0.0dev (2012-11-14 trunk 37650) [x86_64-darwin12.2.1]


The below `calls` object doesn't round trip through marshal on edge ruby:

  def test_marshal_object_and_float
    e = Object.new
    calls = []
    calls << [2.0, e]
    calls << [e]
    assert_equal calls, Marshal.load(Marshal.dump(calls))
  end

When I run this test case, for some reason, the float takes the place of the object in the second array:

[36/82] TestMarshal#test_marshal_object_and_float = 0.00 s         
  1) Failure:
test_marshal_object_and_float(TestMarshal) [/Users/aaron/git/ruby/test/ruby/test_marshal.rb:40]:
<[[2.0, #<Object:0x007fa5c20b08a0>], [#<Object:0x007fa5c20b08a0>]]> expected but was
<[[2.0, #<Object:0x007fa5c20b05a8>], [2.0]]>.

I've attached a failing test case.


-- 
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/