[#48729] [ANN] ruby 2.0.0-preview1 released — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語はあとで
Hi,
Hello Vit,
2012/11/6 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>
[#48745] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7267][Open] Dir.glob on Mac OS X returns unexpected string encodings for unicode file names — "kennygrant (Kenny Grant)" <kennygrant@...>
[#48773] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7269][Open] Refinement doesn't work if using locate after method — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
(2012/11/03 10:11), headius (Charles Nutter) wrote:
(2012/11/03 10:36), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#48774] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "shugo (Shugo Maeda)" <redmine@...>
[#48819] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48820] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7271][Assigned] Refinement doesn't seem lexical — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#48847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7274][Open] UnboundMethods should be bindable to any object that is_a?(owner of the UnboundMethod) — "rits (First Last)" <redmine@...>
[#48882] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#48964] [Backport93 - Backport #7285][Assigned] some failures on RubyInstaller CI — "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
[#48988] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7292][Open] Enumerable#to_h — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#48997] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7297][Open] map_to alias for each_with_object — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49018] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7299][Open] Ruby should not completely ignore blocks. — "marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)" <ruby-core@...>
[#49078] Re: [ruby-cvs:44714] marcandre:r37544 (ruby_1_9_3): merge revisions r33453, r37542: — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
[#49119] ID_ALLOCATOR ? — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello.
Can I see ruby-prof code?
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 11:14 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#49196] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7322][Open] Add a new operator name #>< for bit-wise "exclusive or" — "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
[#49211] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7328][Open] Move ** operator precedence under unary + and - — "boris_stitnicky (Boris Stitnicky)" <boris@...>
[#49256] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7336][Open] Flexiable OPerator Precedence — "trans (Thomas Sawyer)" <transfire@...>
[#49267] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7340][Open] 'each_with' or 'into' alias for 'each_with_object' — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49268] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7341][Open] Enumerable#associate — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
[#49282] Re: [ruby-cvs:44801] tenderlove:r37631 (trunk): * probes.d: add DTrace probe declarations. — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello,
Hello,
2012/11/13 U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp>:
[#49298] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7346][Open] object(...) as syntax sugar for object.call(...) — "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
[#49320] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4085] Refinements and nested methods — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
[#49328] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7349][Open] Struct#inspect needs more meaningful output — "postmodern (Hal Brodigan)" <postmodern.mod3@...>
[#49340] bugs.ruby-lang.org - 500 error — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
I've been unable to access it since morning EET (about 6 hours now).
It's almost 3am in Japan now, don't forget.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net> wrote:
[#49354] review open pull requests on github — Zachary Scott <zachary@...>
Could we get a review on any open pull requests on github before the
2012/11/15 Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>:
Ok, I was hoping one of the maintainers might want to.
I could add my eyes to monitor the github issues/pull requests, if only to
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Marc-Andre Lafortune
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Zachary Scott <zachary@zacharyscott.net>
[#49370] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7358][Open] Wrong fd redirection on fork — "felipec (Felipe Contreras)" <felipe.contreras@...>
[#49416] make check: missing psych — Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...>
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#49463] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7375][Open] embedding libyaml in psych for Ruby 2.0 — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 03:05:50AM +0900, vo.x (Vit Ondruch) wrote:
Dne 17.11.2012 21:19, Aaron Patterson napsal(a):
On 17 November 2012 21:34, V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
[#49468] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7378][Open] Adding Pathname#write — "aef (Alexander E. Fischer)" <aef@...>
[#49479] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7379][Open] Unexpected result of Kernel#gets on Windows 8 — "phasis68 (Heesob Park)" <phasis@...>
[#49518] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7383][Open] Use stricter cache check in load.c — "funny_falcon (Yura Sokolov)" <funny.falcon@...>
[#49536] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7388][Open] Object#embed — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49543] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7390][Open] Funny Falcon Threads — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49558] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7395][Open] Negative numbers can't be primes by definition — "zzak (Zachary Scott)" <zachary@...>
[#49868] How to stop spam from ruby-core — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
Hi,
[#49949] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7426][Assigned] Update Rdoc — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
(2012/11/27 13:33), drbrain (Eric Hodel) wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:57 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:09 PM, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#50092] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434][Open] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params — "sam.saffron (Sam Saffron)" <sam.saffron@...>
[#50264] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7457][Open] GC.stat to return "allocated object count" and "freed object count" — "ko1 (Koichi Sasada)" <redmine@...>
[#50306] Towards a better process for changing Ruby — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
Hey folks,
What I'd like to see is primarily better communication and release
Hello Magnus,
Endoh-san,
[#50312] How to stop spam message from redmine.ruby-lang.org — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
HI,
Hi,
[#50372] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7476][Open] missing "IP_TRANSPARENT" constant for IP sockets. — "elico (Eliezer Croitoru)" <eliezer@...>
2013/2/24 ko1 (Koichi Sasada) <redmine@ruby-lang.org>:
[ruby-core:50208] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7434] Allow caller_locations and backtrace_locations to receive negative params
(2012/11/27 15:52), sam.saffron (Sam Saffron) wrote:
> Issue #7434 has been updated by sam.saffron (Sam Saffron).
>
>
>> My question is: use-case of negative number for performance. Your answer only shows "backtrace is big".
>
> Apologies, well for MiniProfiler ( https://github.com/SamSaffron/MiniProfiler/tree/master/Ruby ) we gather stack traces quite aggressively, every time a query is execute a backtrace is materialized.
>
> A classic place of where I would like to cut down on backtrace overhead is the sampling profiler see: https://github.com/SamSaffron/MiniProfiler/blob/master/Ruby/lib/mini_profiler/profiler.rb#L289
I think you need to grab all of stack each time.
I'm not sure the negative number is good for this reason.
> Another use case would be a user option for :application_trace_only, that would figure out how many frames to skip in the first SQL interception and store that on the Thread so following calls to grab stack traces only include the "application" section and the framework stuff is not gathered.
You need to grab all of stack trace to check which is skipped frame or
not. Please correct my if my understanding is wrong.
I also am not sure why negative number is needed for this purpose.
----
Ah, I understand your purpose. I can't understand how to use negative
number.
But I understand now.
[top of stack frame]
caller
foo4
foo3
foo2
foo1
f/w3 # f/w = framework
f/w2
f/w1
main
[bottom of stack frame]
In this case, framework consumes 3 frames and you only want to know
stack frame only "all of frame size - framework frame size (=3)".
I missed the point that framework knows how many frames consumed (in
this case: 3).
2nd argument is "how many frames from top".
So your suggestion.
(2nd argument) `n' means:
if n > 0
how many frames from top of frame
elsif n <= 0
how many frames should *eliminate* from bottom of frame
end
I feel it makes sense.
The last point is API design.
"negative number" to this purpose is feasible?
Any other example for other methods?
--
// SASADA Koichi at atdot dot net